Why early treatment of autism is essential

Michele Tombari, Las Vegas

Wednesday, Feb. 18, 2009 | 2:06 a.m.

The Las Vegas Sun’s news coverage and its editorial page’s support of Assembly Bill 162, which requires insurance coverage for autism, is greatly appreciated. In 1996, when my severely affected son was diagnosed, our insurance specifically excluded autism. We were forced into serious debt to provide a 7-year applied behavioral analysis program. My son now earns a 4.0 GPA in eighth grade, is a Life rank Boy Scout and is a two-time Nevada Regional Robotics Champion.

I was blessed to see my son recover; I was tortured by the children not given the opportunity to recover. For years many other parents and I fought for services in Nevada. This year I am proud to say my 14-year-old son has joined the cause. He recently walked the halls at the Legislative Building, requesting that sponsors sign on to AB162. It was an honor to hear him speak easily and persuasively with legislators about the importance of this bill, and how it would allow others to become taxpaying citizens.

If Nevadans affected by autism don’t have access to early and effective treatment, state money will be needed for a lifetime of specialized care, which for one, untreated, low-functioning person can run as high as $6 million. AB162 will give more children access to this life-altering treatment so they can lead productive lives. It’s a much better choice than increasing taxes to pay for special education and institutions.

If you don’t believe me, just ask my son.