STEVE MARCUS AND CHRIS MORRIS / LAS VEGAS SUN PHOTO ILLUSTRATION
Sunday, Feb. 8, 2009 | 2 a.m.
Sun Archives
- Harmon cancellation helps some, hurts others (1-16-2009)
- Watchers were not watched (1-15-2009)
- How did CityCenter tower flaws persist? (1-8-2009)
- MGM Mirage cancels CityCenter condo project (1-7-2009)
Beyond the Sun
What if they had shorted the Empire State Building by a couple of football fields?
Or gave the Great Pyramid a flattop? Or built the Eiffel Platform?
Size certainly isn’t everything when it comes to buildings, of course. But the impact of many iconic structures is in their sheer stature. That is why it’s so startling — disappointing, even — that the Harmon hotel, CityCenter’s gateway to the Las Vegas Strip, has suddenly been cut down to about half its intended size.
Topping out at 28 stories instead of the proposed 49, the incredible shrinking Harmon seems unfortunately fated to look like a stubby, squashed stepchild next to its soaring CityCenter siblings, the 61-story Aria Resort & Casino and the 57-story Vdara condo-hotel.
That is the result of construction flaws — 15 floors of wrongly installed rebar — that forced MGM Mirage, which is developing the project with Dubai World, to rapidly call for a significant reduction of the nongaming boutique hotel. MGM Mirage canceled the Harmon’s 207-unit condominium component — the top half of the building — and postponed the opening of the hotel to late 2010.
Bleep happens, of course. Every architect has a story, a nightmare tale, of hair-raising contingencies and last-minute changes in plans. MGM Mirage downplays the effect at the Harmon, arguing that the height will scarcely be visible from the street.
But architects not associated with the project say there is no disputing that CityCenter’s grand and gracious addition to the Las Vegas skyline has been compromised.
“Changes happen, yes, but this is more than a change,” said David Schwarz, the noted Washington, D.C.-based architect who is designing the Smith Center for the Performing Arts in downtown Las Vegas. “I’ve never heard of a building being cut in half before.”
With its elegantly elliptical curve and signature variegated blue-and-white exterior suggesting sea glass, the Harmon was expressly designed by British superstar architect Lord Norman Foster to be one of the newly defining iconic buildings in this young, aspiring city. It was designed to harmonize in scale and detail with the other elements of the complex.
Foster is indisputably one of world’s great architects, says Brian Andrews, a visiting professor at the UNLV School of Architecture. “To bring him in and say ‘OK, design this tower,’ and he designs it with a certain proportional system, and then to cut it in half — it’s a disaster.
“And it sends a very bad message to other architects about Las Vegas,” Andrew said. “I’m just worried that other architects are going to say, ‘I’m not going to work in Vegas — look what they did to Foster.’ ”
The other components of the 67-acre project — a Mandarin Oriental Hotel designed by Kohn Pedersen Fox, the dual Veer condominium towers designed by Helmut Jahn, the Aria designed by Cesar Pelli and the Vdara designed by Rafael Vinoly — are expected to open on schedule December.
It’s still unclear how Harmon will be capped, and what reengineering will be required for such infrastructure elements as elevators and vents. If the Harmon’s exterior isn’t significantly redesigned, it risks looking unmistakably out of proportion. Think 28 oz. of tomatoes squished into a 16 oz. can.
However it is eventually received, the Harmon’s height will alter the overall aesthetic effect of CityCenter and the skyscape of modern Las Vegas. When CityCenter opens, the lights will be on at the Harmon but nobody will be home.
That is not what MGM Mirage wanted when it convened a dream team of eight internationally known architects to design CityCenter as “an integrated urban project,” a city within a city. Much of the talk dealt with the importance of the vertical aspect of the project and how the buildings would be designed to work in visual concert.
In other words, if you change one element, all the others will be affected.
The kneecapping of the Harmon must be a disappointment for Foster, whose London-based architectural firm Foster + Partners has lots of “world’s first” and “world’s only” projects on its resume. (Representatives of the firm did not respond to repeated inquiries from the Las Vegas Sun.)
Early sales materials declared the Harmon would be “towering and shimmering,” and Foster announced that “The Harmon Hotel, Spa & Residences will reflect our continuing quest for design excellence that embraces the macro down to the micro — the architecture of form to the quality of the finishes.”
Those early materials also noted that plans, architectural renderings, specifications and locations are subject to change without notice.
The downsizing of the Harmon might be taken as part of a general economic slump in Las Vegas, which started with the decline in the real estate market and has worked its way to the Strip.
But it really comes down due to human error.
Peter Cavaluzzi, who led the overall design vision for CityCenter’s master planners, Ehrenkrantz, Eckstut & Kuhn Architects, downplays the effect on the overall aesthetic effect of the complex.
“The most important aspect was to create buildings and activity right at the Strip, which to a large extent is very new for Las Vegas, where everything in the past had pulled back and you have a big lake or a volcano in front of the hotel,” Cavaluzzi says.
“What we tried to do was bring a level of urbanity in public space right to the Strip. That’s experienced in the first three to five floors, and it doesn’t rely on whether or not you go up another 20 floors.”
Cavaluzzi adds that EE&K’s original sketches show a shorter building at the Harmon site.
CityCenter is the first Las Vegas project for EE&K, hired by MGM Mirage for its expertise in how people experience urban public spaces, as opposed to the traditional casino-resort formula.
Schwarz, the Smith Center designer, disagrees. “You cannot believe that in a project that has been touted as so master-planned and so composed, that taking one of the tallest elements that sits on the Strip and cutting it in half is not a significant change,” he says. “It’s going to very much change the relationship of the project to the Strip.”
“One of the things that was interesting about CityCenter is (the master planners) tried to put a bunch of massing on the Strip, and not build tower behind plinth, which is the prototype of almost all of Las Vegas. So the notion of bringing massing forward to the Strip and making it a more urban setting was a very good thing. I don’t know how chopping that building in half will affect that overall read. It’s got to be risky.”
Schwarz says if he were in Foster’s situation, he would ask MGM Mirage to let him redesign the whole thing, which may, in fact, be what’s going on. “I would ask Foster, ‘OK, how do you finish this building to make it look good?’ Just cutting the top of it off, that to me is not a viable solution. How you make it look intentional is, I think, the question.”
Robert Dorgan, director of the UNLV Downtown Design Center, calls himself “a huge Norman Foster fan.” Foster, he says, is “a big time rock star, part of a group called the British Moderns, who took modernism to a new level. He does great materials research and works with great engineers and looks at disciplines outside of architecture to find out what exactly is cutting edge today. And his buildings are so elegant, so simple on one level, and then when you start to look at them, they really are rich.”
So Dorgan was personally excited that Vegas was finally getting a Foster-designed building, especially because there are not many Foster buildings in the United States.
“I’m sure even if it’s half the size, (the Harmon is) still going to be pretty sweet. But they’ve got to be a little disappointed over there.”







oh look, one can still see the mountains...
Gee, I'm glad I'm not paying for a massive monument to impotency on the Las Vegas Strip.
They should call it "The Viagra".
Wrong rebar? Give me a break. Somebody's gonna get sued -- and ought to.
So now, the Strip will be full of kids riding bikes up and down at all times? if they sell those units, somebody with kids will buy it, can somebody explain to me if that may be the future up there before my next vacation is due?
Face it. Either the City Center will be an economic disaster or it will take so much business away from every other property in Las Veags they will fail. Thanks harry Reid, life on your watch is just getting better and better. Maybe you can arrange for the Mormon Church to buy one of the high rises for a cathedral and we can all be converted to your better life style.
this was not a very unbiased article...
Rabies
While the sweeping glass curves are pleasant enough, it miscalculates from scope to construction.
"It's going to very much change the relationship of the project to the Strip." It's still going to have an interesting relationship to the Polo Towers...there is an arrogance about this project, starting with it's name, but the crux is it's irrational relationship with the Strip, with the City and with the West.
Plinth. Wow, I haven't seen that word used in years. I always thought that "plinth" was the space between, say brick and backup plywood or drywall. I guess it was used here to describe the Harmon in front, and the other towers behind it. It should be called the Union ironworker screw up instead. UISU.
more condo oh well that all we need they be turn in to hotel room soon please enough building high rise untill economy get better.
Remembering the Strip from the fifties, my first impression of City Center was that it's too much and overpowering. It now seems to be another example of the "bigger and more" mentality which has now passed. I wouldn't say the project is a mistake, but surely it's not one that would get approved now. The issue is how to make the best of it for the next few years. Long term will be okay, but the next few years are gonna be tough for this one, like all will be.
Don't complain. That's 21 fewer stories that will fall when the rebar gives. Maybe they can cap it with a 21 story inflatable tower.
I had to chuckle at the word "plinth" in this article. It basically means the bottom part of a pedestal. With the tower going to be roughly half the height of the original design and shorter than the surrounding buildings, maybe they should consider changing the name from Harmon to Plinth.
There is certainly precedent for this happening. 11 Madison Avenue, a victim of the Great Depression:
Opposite Madison Square Park on East 23rd Street are two skyscrapers originally built by MetLife. 1 Madison Avenue, with its ornate clocktower face, was one of Manhattan's first skyscrapers. 11 Madison Avenue was intended to be the base of a much taller skyscraper, but the onset of the Depression forced MetLife to scale back its plans. Even so, the building stands today as an Art Deco masterpiece.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/23rd_Street...)
http://www.finfacts.com/irelandbusinessn...
But who is responsible for the misplaced rebar? The contractor? The engineer? The article does not comment on this.
If this property ever goes up for sale, will the ad read "Harmon Tower, Half Off!"
hi reguspatoff: las vegas sun reporters alexandra berzon and liz benston have been covering the citycenter story intensely, and links to some of their stories, including discussions of responsibility for the rebar, are provided above, on the right hand side of the story you are commenting on.
and thanks to gordie for uncovering a precedent for the half-building.
joe
Deeply embarrassing for the construction industry in Las Vegas. It is unfortunate that most of the country will know the development only as the "one that cut the building in half."
If Lord Norman Foster were Howard Roark, (from the FOUNTAINHEAD) he would have blown up the building by now.
All they need to do is reduce this building by another 28 floors and they will have a perfect solution.
" Mr. Smith is Vice President, Regional Construction Manager at Converse working out of the Las Vegas Office. He has over 18 years of experience in Construction Inspection and is responsible for managing a staff of over 85 technical personnel. Mr. Smith has direct responsibility for managing all Converse materials testing and inspection projects in southern Nevada and Arizona. His duties include client management and relations, directing investigations for material failures, budget management, supervision of materials testing in both the field and laboratory, review of all inspections, development of concrete mix designs, preparation of final reports and direct supervision of all project managers. His project management experience includes responsibility for projects of various scopes and sizes, including high rise structures, hotel/casino properties, commercial developments, industrial buildings, parking structures, residential developments, flood control and pipeline projects, streets, highways, bridges, and utilities, as well as some of the largest, highest profile projects in company history.".......from Converse Consultants Web site www.converseconsultants.com