Group pursuing initiative to raise taxes on gold mining
Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada wants to eliminate deductions that reduce taxes on gold mining companies
Thursday, Dec. 3, 2009 | 7:39 p.m.
A liberal advocacy group will go after gold miners’ state tax deductions, in an effort to raise more than $200 million a year for state coffers.
The board of the Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada voted last month to pursue a statutory initiative to eliminate most of the deductions that reduce the taxes paid by gold mining companies.
Liberals have argued for years that mining does not pay its fair share in tax — an argument that has gained traction as gold prices have soared to record levels while the state’s general fund has faced massive budget shortfalls.
Bob Fulkerson, executive director of PLAN, said the group decided to go after mining because “that’s where the money is.”
“All the state’s other industries — tourism, gaming — are on the ropes,” he
said. “We have an enormous need in our budget. One industry is recording all-time profits, and that’s the mining industry. Yet they’re paying next to nothing to the general fund.”
The statutory initiative process would require the collection of 97,000 signatures by November. If the initiative were qualified by the secretary of state, the Legislature would have 40 days from the start of the 2011 session to enact the legislation. If the Legislature failed to take action, the initiative would then be placed on the 2012 ballot.
Fulkerson said the group hopes to raise $250,000 to cover legal costs and signature gathering.
Besides paying the payroll, sales and other taxes that other businesses pay, mines pay a “net proceeds of minerals” tax based on the value of the ore, after costs such as extraction, transportation and marketing are deducted.
Tim Crowley, president of the Nevada Mining Association, said it would be foolhardy to rely on one business to fill the state’s shortfall.
“We believe that all businesses need to do their fair share,” Crowley said. “We’ve looked at all the tax studies that have been done, and they’ve all concluded that we need to apply taxes evenly to all business. That’s smart tax policy.”
He noted the 2009 Legislature never considered singling out mining. That sentiment has largely come from PLAN, he said.
Crowley said that he believes it’s illegal to change the deductions that mining companies can take, which are set forth in statute. Changing the deductions would alter the “fair market value” of the ore, artificially changing its value, he said.
Nevada produces about 8 percent of the world’s gold, according to the state
Division of Minerals. It trails only China, South Africa and Australia in production.
In 2008, mining paid $49 million in minerals tax to the state’s general fund, along with $42 million to counties’ coffers. That’s an increase from
2005, when mining paid $19 million to the state and $22 million to counties.
By comparison, the state’s liquor tax brought in $41 million and its cigarette tax generated in $110 million in 2008.
Crowley said that while gold prices are at record levels — $1,200 an ounce — the industry has never been stable, falling prey to boom-and-bust cycles that policy makers say Nevada’s existing tax structure already suffers from.
“It would be symbolic to attack one industry that’s doing well,” he said. “We all know the price of gold is going to drop. It would be hitching your wagon to a buggy that’s going to crash at some point.”
It’s unclear how much legislative appetite their would be to take on mining. Any tax increase requires a two-thirds vote of the Legislature and Republicans in the state Senate have strong ties to rural mining areas.
Also, the lawmakers have hinted they’re interested in pursuing a broader tax structure. Mining, which hires its own small army of lobbyists each session, could be a key ally in rounding up votes to change tax policy.
Still, some lawmakers see mining as a popular target with the public. Assemblywoman Sheila Leslie, D-Reno, and one of the most liberal members of the Legislature, said, “My constituents are constantly asking me why mining isn’t paying their fair share.
“If it’s a choice between raising the mining tax or raising the sales tax, I don’t think it’s a question.”
David McGrath Schwartz can be reached at 775-687-4597 or at david.schwartz@lasvegassun.com.
Discussion: comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- Photos: Olivia Culpo, 20, of Rhode Island is crowned 2012 Miss USA at Planet Hollywood
- US Navy hopes stealth ship answers a rising China
- Photos: Derek Hough celebrates 27th birthday at Tabu Ultra Lounge
- Learning about Electric Daisy Carnival fans will help Las Vegas court them
- On the horizon: A quick look at projects poised to shape downtown







If we can tax the casinos in good and bad times and not allow them to deduct cost of running the gaming tables and slots, then Mining should not be allowed to deduct either.
Sign me up.
I don't think this is foolish, but at the same time I agree that a broad based business tax is a good idea if it allows us to make this a better place for all.
Low taxes have not done enough to attract major companies to setting up here, now we need to look to make our foundations in education, public safety, and transportation better then bottom of the barrel.
If Sarah can tax oil companies in Alaska, Gibbons can tax mine companies in Nevada. Or, does he hate Sarah Palin? Owned and operated by the special interests. And no regard for our children. At least, give them a chance and provide decent schools.
Hey Bonnie.
Yes Clyde.
See that bank over there, it's a gold mine, that's "where the money is" let's help ourselves to our "fair share" while revealing our "plan" to the newspapers.
Amazing how a group calling themselves "Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada" (PLAN) can openly "plan" their robberies.
You just can't make this stuff up.
: {
when governing body thinks its job is to attack, those working for public places and with public tax money, all should be fired. Government and equality should go hand-in-hand.
Would this make the Progressive Leadership Alliance look like a bunch of gold diggers? Just a thought......
If these political thieves were progressive leaders, they'd be digging for ways to fund their agendas without robbing others.
The bad guys never view themselves as "the bad guys".
: {
Taxes are too damn high now. Fire half the worthless government employees and cut the salary of the rest by 50%. Get rid of the unions too.
if anything...
these gold mining companies should pay more taxes than other corporations...
because they damage the land...
tax the hell out of these maggots...
and now boys and girls...
we shall see exactly why america is broken...
these mining maggots are paying less than their fair share...
and rather than say...
we are sorry...
we will pay our fair share...
we don't want any special treatment...
these maggots will throw every single piece of crap they can think of against the wall and hope it sticks...
no shame at all...
weasel weasel weasel...
cry cry cry...
boo hoo hoo...
wah wah wah...
maggots maggots everywhere...
Wait, making them pay taxes on their revenue is "robbing" them? Harley, you obviously have no idea how the mining companies have taken advantage of Nevada's citizens and plundered their natural resources.
Take Gypsum, for example.
In 2007, gross proceeds of gypsum mines in Nevada were $14,971,988.
How much did they pay in taxes?
$46.98.
Less than fifty bucks on almost 15 million dollars worth of gross proceeds. That's ridiculous.
In 2007, the gross proceeds of minerals in the state of Nevada was $5,157,136,841.
Mining companies, state-wide paid an effective tax rate of 1.5%.
Had they paid the constitutionally-mandated rate of 5%, Nevada would have seen 3.5x more tax revenue from mining.
Wherever the word "Progressive" appears, please be alerted to its allusion to communism. Hence, please be aware of the Progressive Leadership Alliance's hidden connection to communism. It could be termed a "Communist Front."
On its web-page http://planaction.e-actionmax.com/, it states:
"The Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada is a statewide coalition founded in 1994. Our mission is to build collective strategic action among coalition partners in order to deepen democracy and achieve greater social justice in Nevada. PLAN uses research, public education, leadership development, and grassroots organizing to build power and create more humane solutions to Nevada's problems."
The buzzwords of "progressive," "collective," "democracy," "social justice," "coalition," and "humane" appear in many communist polemics.
Their meanings are Orwellian. In other words, they adhere to the Marxist Principle of Reversal that implies the opposite meaning.
Thinly disguised in this campaign by PLAN is the communist opposition to possession of and trading with gold and the imposition of government-valued fiat currency.
Schnorkel: thanks for the laugh.
You're not serious, are you?
Go to the "Progressive Leadership Alliance" website and click on the "who we are" button. You will find they are a coalition of social parasite groups who want to pick the pockets of working individuals to give more to the bums and worthless trash they represent. Taxes are too high right now. We need a Howard Jarvis in Nevada to improve the lifestyle of the average citizen. Fire government employees starting with the social workers.
All you knee-jerk anti-taxers are hilarious. Let's put some things into perspective:
1. The majority of mines in Nevada are owned by foreign conglomerates.
2. These foreign conglomerates pay next to nothing in taxes.
3. These foreign conglomerates are making record profits, literally extracting the wealth from Nevada to deposit said wealth overseas.
4. These foreign conglomerates do not care for our land, or our retired miners.
5. 55% of tax monies in Nevada go to k-12 teachers.
6. You can't move mining jobs out of state.
It's a slam-dunk to me. Sign me up.
Here's a list of what PLAN is all about..
We also helped pass death penalty reforms, one of the strongest renewable energy portfolio laws in the country, and increased human services funding. PLAN has won monumental policy victories on campaign finance disclosure, racial profiling, AIDS drug funding, low income energy assistance, contraceptive equity, mental health parity, and worker health and safety.
PLAN helped defeat parental notification, "paycheck protection", privatization of medical providers in prisons, "English Only", and attempts to deny state scholarships to undocumented students.
I'll definitely sign on to the initiative.
The mining companies aren't going anywhere, and they need to pay their fair share to take care of our community.
Wake up, Sheeple! If we tax mining, they'll just move those mines somewhere else!