LETTER FROM WASHINGTON:

Legacy of first 100 days rests on second

Obama’s place in history hinges on health care win, even after early victories

Sunday, Aug. 9, 2009 | 2 a.m.

More stories about politics

Politics: The Early Line

Washington — Watching history in real time can be blinding. It unfolds opaquely, the forest we cannot quite bring into view until moving far enough to take a long look back.

As Congress adjourns for the summer recess, the House and Senate’s inability to pass health care legislation by President Barack Obama’s August deadline is seen as a major setback.

The lack of a legislative victory on the priority policy item is a loss, to be sure, but it overshadows the complexity of the first half of this first year of the new administration.

Associate Senate Historian Donald Ritchie is a helpful guide here. “This has been a more productive Congress than we’ve seen in a long time,” he said.

Comparisons to 1933 come to mind, the first year of President Franklin Roosevelt’s first term, when an allied Congress passed the sweeping New Deal legislation.

So, too, do comparisons to 1965, the first year of President Lyndon Johnson’s term, when a sympathetic Congress was finally able to usher through Medicare, the Voting Rights Act and the War on Poverty efforts that had been dammed up.

Ritchie said several factors are at play to create an environment where Congress can work so productively — a new president with an active agenda, a robust majority in Congress and a crisis.

All three were present in 1933 when the New Deal was passed during the Great Depression and again in 1965 as Johnson entered his first full term after John Kennedy’s assassination.

“You have that combination in this Congress,” Ritchie said. “The stars are aligning.”

The greatest hits signed into law so far:

• An expansion of a popular children’s health care program that was vetoed twice under President George W. Bush but is now law.

• A fair-pay law that gives those who have been discriminated against more time to pursue damages.

• An economic recovery package that is the country’s largest single attempt to shore up the economy with extra unemployment benefits, tax cuts, health care assistance and money to build roads and other public works projects.

• Anti-tobacco legislation that had been pursued unsuccessfully for decades and will require bolder warning labels on cigarette packages and end the sale of candy-flavored smokes attractive to kids.

• New credit card rules that ban random interest rate hikes, shifting due dates and other practices that contribute to increased debt.

• Housing help to broaden the eligibility requirements of a mortgage rescue plan.

• A sweeping public lands bill that sets aside more acreage for conservation than any legislation in years.

• A novel “cash for clunkers” program that is giving the auto industry a jolt by offering cash incentives for those who junk gas guzzlers and buy new wheels.

• And the Senate’s approval last week of Sonia Sotomayor as the first Hispanic justice on the Supreme Court.

A couple of months back, when the tobacco bill passed, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said that in a typical year, that would be enough of a victory for Congress to hang its hat on.

Obama knows that he must sprint through the year, as do House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Reid. By the second year of a new administration, the presidential honeymoon is over and mid-term congressional elections are in play. Legislating recedes and politicking comes to the fore.

If health care reform passes this fall, 2009 will clearly become one for the history books. If not, the legacy of this Congress will remain opaque until we move farther along.

Discussion: 5 comments so far…

By cignettis

8/9/09 at 8:56 a.m.

Suggest removal

What you have here is the blind leading the blind. In the first 100 days that this Obamination was in office: 1. He continued to blame the Bush Administration at every oppurtunity he got. 2. He placed this nation into further unneccesary debt. 3. He apologized for this nation and made us look like fools. 4. He showed his arrogance every chance he got and the liberal press bowed down and praised this do nothing. 5. He addmittidly said that he has not read much of the legislation that he is trying to pass. 6. He opens his mouth without engaging his brain as in stupidly. As the old saying goes-----Ye shall judge a person by his deeds not his words as words are cheap. Hopefully it will come to pass that over 50% of the people will see clearly the big L on his forehead. The polls are already indicating that.
By stopblamingamerica

8/9/09 at 9:51 a.m.

Suggest removal

I find it funny that when the left is against something, they'll disturb peaceful gatherings.they'll crash places of worship with signs and lots of yelling, gays french kissing right on the alter,not caring that young children our watching. And when you call their leaders on it all she says is "Dissent is The Highest Form of Patriotism" - Hillary Clinton '06 But when ordinary folks get fed up with Obama and the Dem's huge spending agenda, and start passionately voicing their dissent to this 1000 page monstrosity of a bill,They call us an organized mob.One senator even called it terrorism HELLO TERRORISM. Obama didn't even read OR WRITE the bill, and were suppose to trust him .Like we did with the pork infested budget(That no one got to read either)trust him like we did with the $780 BILLION DOLLAR STIMULUS.Trust him and harry Reid,Nancy pelosi,Barny frank, with all these bailouts(2 billion going to oversea companies.We have a president that goes on American apology tours.He would also rather support that ousted dictator in Honduras who was trying to change their constitution just like Castro,and Chavez did. He tells a police officer "he acted stupidly",before he even new all the facts.We have a attorney general that calls americans cowards(The world and are enemies probably got a good laugh out of that one) Now were told to spy on other americans and report them for any "fishy" behaviour.(sounds Orwellian to me)And now they don't understand why we don't want this so called health care PILL, shoved down our THROATS. Lets let everybody read this bill so we can understand it, to see if it's a good bill for, we the people.Before they put a recking ball to the American health care system.This is to important to rush it faster then Obama chose his dog.Why are they so afraid if we read it.Are they afraid we might expose corruption? or confusing lawyer trickery? READ THE BILL!!!!!
By davidwayneosedach

8/9/09 at 10:24 a.m.

Suggest removal

In other words they accomplished next to nothing.
By mred

8/9/09 at 1:30 p.m.

Suggest removal

Obama's on a roll. The rights in retreat. They couldn't even fill the "Sean Insannity Freedumb concert" without giving away the seats.
By gotjobs

8/9/09 at 3:42 p.m.

Suggest removal

After all we've heard about "give Obamas plans a chance" to work, isn't it a bit early to be talking about "legacy" Lisa?