courts:
Las Vegans among investors suing over auctioned securities
Tuesday, Aug. 4, 2009 | 1:55 a.m.
Sun Coverage
Investors who lost billions of dollars by buying "auction rate securities" are fighting back with lawsuits around the country -- including one involving a prominent Las Vegas family.
Betty Engelstad, widow of longtime Imperial Palace hotel-casino owner Ralph Engelstad, and other trustees of a Ralph and Betty Engelstad Family Trust filed suit over their losses in Clark County District Court Friday.
The defendants are Wells Fargo & Co. and subsidiaries Wells Fargo Bank, Wells Fargo Institutional Securities LLC and Wells Fargo Brokerage Services LLC.
The lawsuit is similar to one filed against Wells Fargo in April by the state of California accusing the banking giant of securities fraud.
California Attorney General Jerry Brown said he sued to recover $1.5 billion for California investors who purchased auction rate securities based on allegedly "false and deceptive" advice that the financial instruments were "as safe and liquid as cash."
Wells Fargo, which earlier was sued by the state of Washington, has denied wrongdoing in connection with its auction rate securities sales.
"We fully understand and deeply regret the effects this prolonged liquidity crisis has had on our clients. Wells Fargo could not have predicted these extraordinary circumstances, and even with the benefit of hindsight is not responsible for them," Charles Daggs, CEO of Wells Fargo Investments LLC, said in response to the California lawsuit.
"In April 2008, Wells Fargo led the industry in helping clients affected by the crisis by voluntarily providing significant liquidity to clients holding ARPs. Since that time, and despite the unprecedented nature and length of liquidity problems in the market, these clients have had access to 90 percent of the par value of their ARP holdings through non-recourse loans at favorable rates. We are not aware of any other similarly situated company that voluntarily provided a comparable loan program or took action on behalf of their clients before Wells Fargo implemented its loan program. We also have worked individually with clients who have special needs, and will continue to do so," said Daggs.
On July 20 the federal Securities and Exchange Commission settled charges against TD Ameritrade Inc. that alleged the online brokerage made inaccurate statements when selling auction rate securities (ARS) to customers.
The SEC previously announced ARS settlements with Bank of America and its subsidiary Merrill Lynch, Citigroup, UBS, Wells Fargo subsidiary Wachovia, RBC Capital Markets and Deutsche Bank.
"TD Ameritrade is the latest in a series of landmark ARS settlements that bring unprecedented relief to tens of thousands of investors," Robert Khuzami, director of the SEC's Division of Enforcement, said in announcing the TD Ameritrade settlement. "ARS customers of numerous firms can get back all of the money they invested in auction rate securities as more than $50 billion in liquidity is being made available to them through these historic settlements."
Brown, the California attorney general, said auction rate securities are investments with long-term maturity dates like bonds that Wells Fargo and other banks marketed as short-term investments equivalent to cash. These investments paid a slightly better rate of return than a bank account. And, investors could sell the securities at regular weekly or monthly auctions, which provided the promise of liquidity, Brown said.
In February 2008, auctions in the $330 billion market froze up nationwide, and investors were no longer able to redeem their securities for cash, as promised. This left approximately 2,400 Californians who had invested with Wells Fargo without access to more than $1.5 billion, Brown said.
The Internet is now full of stories regarding state securities regulators and individual investors suing brokerage houses over auction rate securities sales.
In its lawsuit, the Engelstad trust said Ralph and Betty Engelstad had by late 2002 deposited millions of dollars with Wells Fargo and, through Wells Fargo, invested millions of dollars in auction rate securities.
Following Ralph Engelstad's death in November 2002, the trust continued to invest in the securities through Wells Fargo, the lawsuit said.
It said Trish McArthur, a Wells Fargo executive in Las Vegas, told the trust in late 2002 or 2003 and in later years that auction rate securities "were safe, secure, liquid investments that could be converted to cash after periods of seven days or 28 days or longer, and that auction rate securities typically bore interest at rates which were slightly higher than those available for federally insured certificates of deposit and money market investments."
But on Oct. 5, 2007, the trust said it learned of problems with the securities when Wells Fargo said two auctions failed involving "Class V Funding ARS" and "Athilon ARS" securities. Wells Fargo told the trust that because these securities held some collateralized debt obligations, there were no buyers for them at the auction, the lawsuit said.
The Engelstad lawsuit alleges Wells Fargo failed to disclose that the securities at issue "only appeared readily liquid at the time they were purchased and acquired for the trust's benefit because broker-dealers in the auction market were artificially supporting and manipulating the market to maintain the appearance of liquidity and stability."
Auction rate securities were a highly profitable business for Wells Fargo, motivating the company to "make false and misleading omissions and statements of material fact about auction rate securities in order to perpetuate their interests as remarketing agents for those securities," the suit charges.
The lawsuit says that as recently as last month, Wells Fargo has refused to purchase or redeem the Engelstad trust's investments in the illiquid ARS investments.
The suit alleges violations of the federal Securities Exchange Act outlawing manipulative or deceptive securities sales practices and violations of Nevada laws barring the sale of unregistered securities and outlawing fraudulent securities sales.
The Engelstad Trust seeks unspecified damages and a court order requiring Wells Fargo to reimburse the trust for its illiquid investments.
Discussion: comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- Photos: Olivia Culpo, 20, of Rhode Island is crowned 2012 Miss USA at Planet Hollywood
- Photos: Derek Hough celebrates 27th birthday at Tabu Ultra Lounge
- More than 43,000 have voted early in Clark County
- US Navy hopes stealth ship answers a rising China
- Firefighters respond to reports of explosion; find vacant building in flames







Wow, Wells Fargo is so nice. They put you in an investment based on the sales pitch that you can get your money out in either seven or twenty-eight days. Of course it isn't true. But being the wonderful bank they are they will now loan you money as long as you pay them interest? So they take your money, then use it to loan out but won't let you have your money back. Almost sounds like a ponzi scheme.
I also was duped by Wells Fargo into buying these securities. They are offering to loan me my own money back for a fee of course. Wells Fargo lied about the liquidity of these investments, and its time to pay up.
Why are ARSs so illiquid? Surely there must be a buyer at some price, assuming the seller will take the market price. And if the seller doesn't want the market price, well that is their problem, isn't it? They create their own "illiquidity" by not accepting the best price the free and open market offers.
We also got hung with ALL our cash in Nuveen ARS sold to us by Ameriprise. They were marketed to us as "safe as cash" or "like a money market fund." We accepted a low rate of interest in exchange for what was supposed to be total safety and liquidity for our funds. Saying "just sell them at market price" misses the point. These were supposed to be zero risk.
We did eventually have to sell them on the secondary market for $0.80 on the dollar and are now racking up legal fees trying to recover the $159,000 we lost in the process. Our contact at Second Market tells us all those banks who've been forced to buy ARS back from their clients are now flooding the secondary market and prices are now much, much lower...
Where was the old SEC and where is the new SEC and the FBI in what looks like a Wells Fargo Ponzi scheme to me?
The Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, New York Times and every other news outlet in the country could be very helpful if they could join with the Las Vegas Sun to discover what is special about the way Wells Fargo took $3.93 billion of their clients money, to produce profits for Wells in this auction-rate-secutities scheme, from what many other firms did that caused them to pay fines to regulators and make restitutions to defrauded clients?
Could regulators define for clients how to protect themselves from Banks destroying the utility of savings and retirement money that clients entrust to their banks for short term safe keeping?
Is it time to return the Glass-Steagall act that prevented banks from doing this to clients for 63 years untill it was repealed in 1999?
Finally I see some action by Las Vegas Sun. This is the city where I was conned (solicitied in to the ARS) by the nice little old lady looking me in the eye and convincing me what a great honest financial advisor I had just found. How could I be so lucky!
This is when the nightmare began!
Luckily , 8 months into this nightmare, I received all of my money back.
Thanks to the Attorney General Andrew Cuomo and his team of lawyers.
The SEC in Vegas did absolutely nothing to help in the 330 billion dollar freeze of the ARS .
I guess some employees just sit on their rear ends and do nothing all day in their state and government positions.
Yes, it is about time that the Wall Street Journal, WP, NYT and every other news outlet in the country join forces with the LV Sun to discover how all of these banks were able to pull off a heist of this magnitude!
I hope all that has been left behind receives their hard earned money back.