Facebook
Fark
Digg
Reddit
Stumble
Monday, Aug. 3, 2009 | 12:41 p.m.
Sun Coverage
State Sen. Mike Schneider today agreed to pay $150,000 in damages to settle a defamation lawsuit brought by his 2004 election challenger, Danny Tarkanian.
In a verdict late Friday night, a Clark County District Court jury awarded Tarkanian, son of former UNLV basketball coach Jerry Tarkanian, $50,000 in damages. Schneider has agreed not to appeal the verdict.
Jurors were scheduled to hear Schneider, a real estate consultant, testify today as to his finances then decide on punitive damages. The deal was reached prior to the hearing.
Tarkanian’s attorney, Gus Flangas, said the verdict also disproves the allegations of criminal behavior Schneider raised in televised debates and in campaign fliers.
The 47-year-old Tarkanian filed the lawsuit in March 2005 after losing the election.
Jurors spoke to the attorneys after the hearing. A few of them said the televised October 2004 debate on Sun columnist Jon Ralston’s show “Face to Face” was the most important piece of evidence.
Schneider-Tarkanian 2004 Debate, seg. 1
Viewing video requires the latest version of Adobe's Flash Player
A Clark County jury says State Sen. Mike Schneider (Clark-D) defamed his opponent, Danny Tarkanian, in debates and in campaign ads during the 2004 election. Will the decision change the way future campaigns are run?
Schneider-Tarkanian 2004 Debate, seg. 2
Viewing video requires the latest version of Adobe's Flash Player
A Clark County jury says State Sen. Mike Schneider (Clark-D) defamed his opponent, Danny Tarkanian, in debates and in campaign ads during the 2004 election. Will the decision change the way future campaigns are run?
New Details, seg. 4
Viewing video requires the latest version of Adobe's Flash Player
What did they know, and when did they know it? That is the question facing Republicans amid the revelation that GOP staff knew about U.S. Sen. John Ensign's affair with a former staff member before the 2008 election. Jon asks conservative political consultant Steve Wark and liberal blogger Erin Neff about that and a court ruling that could change the face of political campaigns in Nevada.
Jurors reviewed the tape of the debate and the transcript of Schneider's testimony during three hours of deliberations on Friday.
Schneider accused Tarkanian of setting up telemarketing companies that were later found to be running scams and that he turned “state’s evidence” against the telemarketers to avoid being prosecuted.
Tarkanian practiced civil law until 1995 and admitted he helped set up the companies but had no involvement in the day-to-day operations of any of them. He said he was not aware that any of the companies were already engaged in illegal activity at the time that he helped to set up them.
Leif Reid, a former assistant U.S. Attorney, testified that Tarkanian was not part of the investigation into the companies.
Schneider, D-Las Vegas, was defending the heavily Democratic District 11 he had represented since 1997 from Tarkanian, a Republican who said he moved into the district before the election because he thought it was vulnerable.
Schneider won the election by nearly 2,000 votes, or about 7 percentage points.
Schneider testified that he relied on his investigator and campaign team for the veracity of the information.
His attorney, Nelson Cohen, declined to comment.
Flangas said he believes the jury’s decision does not redefine First Amendment rights of free speech but just that candidates should verify information during campaigns.
“It probably will have an effect on campaigns because you might want to think the message sent (by the jury) is ‘be truthful,’” he said. “There comes a point in time where spin is no longer spin. It becomes a false statement.”
CORRECTION: This story was updated to correct the spelling of Leif Reid's name as well as his title. | (August 5, 2009)
Wow, how far down do you have to read a Las Vegas Sun article to find the guilty's political party when they are a Democrat?
The author almost seemed to try to hide the fact that the GUILTY party, Mike Schneider is a DEMOCRAT who had to resort to defamation of character to win an election is a heavy majority Democrat district against a Republican.
I'm not too surprised. Seems that Dems like to call names and make up lies instead of debating the facts. Just read the comments in most of the Sun's article to enforce my point.
As a conservative, it drives me nuts when conservatives try to find bias in the media. It is possible this was done on purpose, but the "media bias" argument will start to lose it's luster if it is overused.
Good job Danny and your attorneys. It is hard to win a defamation case when your client is a public figure running for public office. Malice is not easily proven, well done.
It is great that Mr. Tarkanian stood up for himself, and it's even better that he actually won. Maybe after this victory Danny will decide to run for office again. I think the strength he demonstrated by defending his good name would serve him well in public office.