SUN EDITORIAL:

Protecting right to privacy

Congress should make sure National Security Agency wiretaps are lawful

Saturday, April 18, 2009 | 2:08 a.m.

Although the 9/11 attacks prompted sweeping changes in national security designed to thwart future terrorist events in this country, there remains a fine line between protecting the United States from those threats and violating Americans’ individual freedoms.

That’s why it was disturbing to read Thursday in The New York Times that the National Security Agency in recent months intercepted domestic e-mail messages and phone calls from Americans on a scale that exceeded legal limits set by Congress last year, unnamed government officials said.

Attorney General Eric Holder this year sought approval from a national security court, which oversees agency wiretaps, to renew the surveillance program after the Justice Department said it had corrected the problems. The intelligence agency also told the Times the wiretap operations are lawful.

But the Times reported that the extent, if any, to which Americans’ privacy was unlawfully violated remains unknown. One government official said the agency inadvertently targeted groups of Americans without proper court authority. If true, that certainly crossed the line.

The wiretap problems reportedly were blamed in part on technical glitches that sometimes made it difficult to distinguish between communications inside this country and those overseas.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, made the right move in response to the story by calling for a hearing to investigate the agency’s practices, even though members of Congress have received secret briefings on the wiretap problem since February.

Although the agency plays a crucial role in keeping the U.S. safe from terrorist attacks, it should correct wiretap problems as soon as possible rather than let them fester. The failure to take immediate corrective action creates situations where Americans are unnecessarily targeted.

Comments
Print
E-mail
Share
- Facebook
- Fark
- Digg
- Reddit
- Stumble
Tweet

Discussion: comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

No trusted comments have been posted.

By KillerB

April 18, 2009

10:56 a.m.

Flag

The criminals we allow to run this country can't read plain language: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated..."

So Congress passed laws in direct violation of that promise and now the feds STILL can't be bothered to stay within their limits??

This is more proof we let the feds way too far off their leash. Go get 'em, Dianne!
By Harley

April 18, 2009

11:45 a.m.

Flag

Abolish the Patriot Act, the TSA, NSA, CIA, FBI and Presidential executive order.
By KillerB

April 18, 2009

3 p.m.

Flag

Ron Paul didn't get elected because he was going to dismantle about 80% of the federal government as unConstitutional and unNecessary.

Harley's list is like a thousand attorneys found at the bottom of Lake Mead -- a good start.