carson city:
Domestic partnership legislation advances
Full Senate votes next on bill aimed at same-sex couples
Thursday, April 9, 2009 | 2 a.m.
Sun coverage
Nevada is prohibited by its constitution from joining states, most recently Vermont and Iowa, where gay marriage is legal. But legislation is making its way through Carson City that would give same-sex couples who enter domestic partnerships the same benefits as married couples.
Advocates of the bill, however, are careful to distinguish their proposal from traditional marriage, given Nevada voters banned gay marriage in 2002.
Senate Bill 283 cleared a key hurdle Wednesday, passing a Senate committee by a 4-2 vote.
Jan Gilbert, a lobbyist with the Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada, called the domestic partnerships bill “a big step.”
But she added, “It is not about marriage; this is about domestic partnerships.”
Domestic partnerships could be entered into by following a path that would be laid out by the secretary of state.
The bill now must clear the Senate floor, where Democrats hold a 12-9 majority over Republicans.
Sen. David Parks, D-Las Vegas, the only openly gay member of the Legislature, sponsored the bill.
He added an amendment Wednesday that exempts the state and local governments from being required to pay for domestic partner benefits.
Democrats on the committee voted for the bill. Sen. Warren Hardy, R-Las Vegas, and Sen. Dean Rhoads, R-Tuscarora, voted against the bill. Sen. Mark Amodei, R-Carson City, was absent.
•••
On an 18-3 vote, the full Senate approved a bill Wednesday that would ban text-messaging by motorists.
The bill, which goes to the Assembly for consideration, would exempt a motorist who “reads, selects or enters a telephone number” to make a cell phone call. The bill defines text-based communications as text messages, instant messages or electronic mail.
Senate Bill 136 would require a $20 fine for the first offense. The second offense would result in a $50 fine; subsequent offenses would result in $100 fines.
•••
If it wasn’t clear by the bills detailed above, this is a deadline time in Carson City — bills have to pass out of their respective committees by the end of the week, so agendas are packed.
The range and breadth of legislation is striking: Taxing plastic grocery bags, new rules for homeowners associations, regulation of accountants, changes in workers’ compensation insurance, a vast education reform bill, a mandate that the county hospital treat poor people for cancer.
That’s just a fraction of what appeared on agendas Wednesday.
It’s your citizen Legislature at work.
Sun Capital Bureau Chief Cy Ryan and Sun reporter J. Patrick Coolican contributed to this story.
Discussion: comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- Coolican: Henderson officials out of loop on police brutality case, raising red flags
- Lumberjacks — ‘Where the Big Boys Eat’ — hiring for North Las Vegas location
- Berkley draws stark contrasts with Heller over immigration
- Howard Miller, prominent lawyer and ‘true Las Vegas native,’ dies at 68
- Short memories may serve president
- Two dead after accident in downtown Las Vegas
- Instant Analysis: Debating whether UNLV should continue series with San Diego State
- Superstar Whitney Houston dies at 48
- Police looking for man in white Ford Explorer
- Saying ‘No mas’ to government
Blogs
The Kats Report
Live color from the scene at Thomas & Mack Center: We have a wire job! Rebels win, and Louie Armstrong sings!
South Point owner Michael Gaughan's take on 'Vegas Stripped': 'I'll give it an 8' (4 Comments)
Author relishes writing the life story of ‘larger-than-life’ Oscar Goodman (3 Comments)
Elsewhere
Landowner: All roads could lead to Uxbridge casino
Revel reveals smoke-free casino opening
Cirque du Soleil show in Sands China casino to close this month
Meet the woman behind Sheldon Adelson
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.



Who are the 3 idiots who voted against the texting while driving??
Economic issues matter and marriage is an economic issue. Studies show that married people are slightly healthier (less costs) and wealthier (pay more taxes) than their single counterparts and this is true for gay people as well. Therefore, it is in the state's best economic interest to grant marriage equality.
Separate but equal didn't work for civil rights and shouldn't work now.
azsk8fan -- look closer, it wasn't just texting. But yeah, they all missed the point again ... the point being ANY distractions that impairs a driver should be a violation. Someone entering GPS info or even programming their stereo are equally guilty. So is reading papers or putting on makeup (seen these). Washington state got it right the first time -- it's an offense only if the cop pulls you over for something else. Like weaving or careless driving.
scottc -- what you said, 100%!
The bottom line -- "It's your citizen Legislature at work." Rants and comments should be directed to your elected reps in Carson City, not just here!
Separate but equal occurred because the meddlesome government couldn't allow private companies to profit off of equality.