Facebook
Fark
Digg
Reddit
StumbleState Supreme Court won’t rule on teen sex offender law
Monday, Sept. 8, 2008 | 6:41 p.m.
CARSON CITY -- The Nevada Supreme Court has declined to rule on the constitutionality of a new law stating that teenage sex offenders can be punished as adults.
The court dismissed the appeal of Clark County in 21 cases that these youth, who were 14 years old and older and had committed sexual acts, had to register as sex offenders.
District Judge William Voy of the Clark County Family Court ruled that a part of a new law involving sexual offenses by teenagers was invalid. He said setting the age at 14 was arbitrary. There should be a basis for setting that age, he said.
In his decision, Voy said some youngsters who are younger than 14 are just as disposed to committing another sex crime and the law takes away the discretion of the courts.
In dismissing the appeal, the Supreme Court said the decision of Judge Voy is not a final judgment in the cases of these 21 juveniles. “We lack jurisdiction to consider these appeals,” said the three-justice panel of the Supreme Court.
The 2007 Legislature patterned the law after the federal Adam Walsh Act that included many teenage sex offenders age 14 and older with adults in requirements for sex offender registration and community notification.
The federal act said the states must enact similar laws or lose federal funds.
Discussion: comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- Superstar Whitney Houston dies at 48
- Two dead after accident in downtown Las Vegas
- Instant Analysis: Debating whether UNLV should continue series with San Diego State
- Police looking for man in white Ford Explorer
- Dining Guide: 2012 Valentine’s Day options in Las Vegas
- Color from the scene at Thomas & Mack Center: We have a wire job! Rebels win, and Louie Armstrong sings!
- Four people injured in car accident
- Blog: Justin Hawkins’ steal seals UNLV’s thrilling 65-63 victory against San Diego State
- UNLV makes key plays down stretch to hold off San Diego State 65-63
- After Nevada and Florida wins, Mitt Romney trying to prove he’s ‘severely conservative’ to CPAC base
Blogs
The Kats Report
Color from scene at Thomas & Mack: We have a wire job! Rebels win, and Louie Armstrong sings!
South Point owner Michael Gaughan's take on 'Vegas Stripped': 'I'll give it an 8' (4 Comments)
Author relishes writing the life story of ‘larger-than-life’ Oscar Goodman (3 Comments)
Elsewhere
Landowner: All roads could lead to Uxbridge casino
Revel reveals smoke-free casino opening
Cirque du Soleil show in Sands China casino to close this month
Meet the woman behind Sheldon Adelson
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
ats cuz day doan no watt to say
I thank the writer for the article.
Great to see the news.
The link to the actual Court Case and previous ruling is here:
http://www.leg.state.nv.us/74th/Bills/AB...
I must say, I wished the writer of the article would do a more descriptive explanation of the decision.
I found the below thought on another website:
In a previous decision....Here it is in slow-mo: Under the new laws, 14-year-old sex offenders can be punished as adults. But a child who is 13 years, 11 months and 29 days can’t. This age distinction, Voy noted, is arbitrary. Without a rational reason for the age cap, the law is a violation of due process, because part of due process is the right to rational law.
Were it not for Voy’s determination, the laws would go into effect July 1. Maggie McCletchie, ACLU of Nevada staff attorney, expects the laws will not be enforced until the Supreme Court hears the appeals. The state’s high court is not expected to rule on the case before July 1.
http://www.cfcamerica.org
"The 2007 Legislature patterned the law after the federal Adam Walsh Act that included many teenage sex offenders age 14 and older with adults in requirements for sex offender registration and community notification.
The federal act said the states must enact similar laws or lose federal funds."
Notice how the Federal Government is blackmaling the states? Pass these laws, or you will lose money.
Is that Extortion, or Blackmail... what would the legal term be for that.
This practice only promotes legislatures, hungry for money for their state, and eager to make a name for themselves to pass ignorant legislation which harms thousands of children and families, effectively making thousands of VICTIMS.
These legislators always talk about the Victim of sex crimes.. holding up some horrific crime which happened recently to shock the voters.. then they get laws passed that make thousands of victims.
Example.. Come watch an innocent 14 year old tell his story of how the united states is effectively ruining his life with legislation such as the Retroactive Adam Walsh Act which is totally unconstitutional. His video is here.
http://www.failamerica.blogspot.com
Families Against Ignorant Legislation, America
Warning, the video may elicit many emotions from the viewer.
Hmmm... A double edged sword here. I will say that Adam Walsh is a manic crusader for the rights of the abused child. Who can blame him after what he went through? He has taken it to extreme limits and it does not take a psychologist to recognize his life-long guilt over the loss of his child to a probable sex maniac, child killer. Politicians, talk-show hosts, police officials have rallied to his cause - no matter who might be innocent or in the way.
Common sense should play a role here - not Adam Walsh. If some 14 year old boy is sexually active (intercourse) with an age appropriate, consenting partner - then such is not a sex crime and the boy should not be listed as such (or vice-versa).
Hows about 'do an adult crime, do adult time'....and I would certainly think violating anyone sexually would fall into the 'adult crime' category.