Facebook
Fark
Digg
Reddit
StumbleFor Taser, suit ends in lose-one, win-one scenario
Jury finds negligence, but judge spares company $5 million punitive payout
Friday, Nov. 28, 2008 | 2 a.m.
Three years ago in Salinas, Calif., police used Tasers to repeatedly shock 40-year-old Robert Heston.
He died the next day.
Heston had been high on methamphetamine and living with an enlarged heart because of long-term drug abuse. Still, in June, a jury found the Tasers were partially to blame for his death.
This was Taser Inc.’s first loss in civil court, a significant event that’s nonetheless overshadowing the bigger story here: The medical evidence that Heston’s attorneys used to win the case could do a lot more damage to Taser International Inc. than the lawsuit itself.
Heston’s attorneys presented a novel argument: Prolonged or repeated Tasering causes acidosis, an excess of acid in the bloodstream. The acidosis, in turn, can cause cardiac arrest. Unlike other arguments against the Taser’s safety, which have been unsuccessful partially because they’re bogged down with complicated science, the Heston case presents a tidy medical cause and effect that worked with one jury.
In other words, don’t be surprised if you hear about Taser acidosis deaths again.
Heston’s attorneys have taken on similar cases and their quotes in the media give Taser warnings about what could come.
As John Burton, one of those attorneys, told Bloomberg News, “I think Taser’s going to have to rethink its litigation strategy and its warning policies.’’
Local observers have taken notice as well.
“It’s a new argument that’s a lot cleaner and less complicated to prove,” said Maggie McLetchie, staff attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada. “It will help push the dialogue forward on the proper use of Tasers.”
Jurors in the Heston case determined that Taser failed to warn police that multiple shocks could cause cardiac arrest. Heston’s family was awarded about $5.2 million in punitive damages. Shortly afterward, the Arizona-based company’s stock fell just more than 10 percent. Taser International filed a challenge to the damages award and requested a new trial.
Taser didn’t get a new trial, but it did get the millions of dollars back. In October a judge threw out the punitive damages. This is because the Heston jury only ruled that Taser should have known the device can cause cardiac arrest, not that company officials actually did know — enough of a distinction to clear the company of product liability problems.
Now Taser is indebted to the Heston estate for less than $200,000 in compensatory damages.
An article in the Monterey County Herald noted that each side claimed this was a victory, and each side is right.
Heston’s attorneys have successfully held Taser liable for negligence, a precedent that could affect lawsuits to come.
Taser, in turn, saved itself some money, cash the company may need later, should the Heston argument work again.
Taser International spokesman Steve Tuttle would not comment directly on the Heston case, but provided a company news release on the subject. In that release, Taser attorney Doug Klint said he was pleased with the outcome, but still considering filing an appeal.
The release also emphasized that the Taser device was deemed only 15 percent responsible for Heston’s death.
It’s easy to understand why the company wants to affirm that it is not a lethal weapon. That is, after all, a linchpin of Taser’s sales to more than 13,000 law enforcement, correctional and military agencies in 44 countries.
In Clark County, there are five lawsuits pending against Metro Police for incidents in which officers shocked people with Tasers. The department has a good record when it comes to these kind of cases — it has defeated five so far.
Discussion: comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- Coolican: Henderson officials out of loop on police brutality case, raising red flags
- Lumberjacks — ‘Where the Big Boys Eat’ — hiring for North Las Vegas location
- Berkley draws stark contrasts with Heller over immigration
- Two dead after accident in downtown Las Vegas
- Superstar Whitney Houston dies at 48
- Instant Analysis: Debating whether UNLV should continue series with San Diego State
- Howard Miller, prominent lawyer and ‘true Las Vegas native,’ dies at 68
- Short memories may serve president
- Police looking for man in white Ford Explorer
- Saying ‘No mas’ to government
Blogs
The Kats Report
Color from scene at Thomas & Mack: We have a wire job! Rebels win, and Louie Armstrong sings!
South Point owner Michael Gaughan's take on 'Vegas Stripped': 'I'll give it an 8' (4 Comments)
Author relishes writing the life story of ‘larger-than-life’ Oscar Goodman (3 Comments)
Elsewhere
Landowner: All roads could lead to Uxbridge casino
Revel reveals smoke-free casino opening
Cirque du Soleil show in Sands China casino to close this month
Meet the woman behind Sheldon Adelson
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
Whether there is alternative Taser? Probably, it is time to pay attention to new technologies? For example, NEW S5 multi-shot remote stun gun (PULL DOWN GUN). Uniqueness S5: automatic restriction of electrical discharge by a level which is necessary and sufficient for a immobilization of object.
www.pulldowngun.narod.ru
How about we agree that a stun gun or tazer can be more effective in some lethal force situations, and in most cases result in the suspect staying alive and going to trial for the accused crimes. Alternative: firearms and funerals.
A few points:
1. Most states (actually, the vast majority) have comparative fault bars ... which means that if the plaintiff is 50% or more at fault (as Heston was found 85% at fault), then the defendant (TASER) does not pay a dime. Thus, had the Heston case occurred in most (40+) states -- TASER would not have paid a dime.
2. The compensatory damages owed by TASER is $153,150 -- as stated in the article this is less than $200,000, but (at least to me) $46,850 is a significant number .. or, to put it another way ... the $200,000 number is 24% too high. Also, according to Burton ... this amount of money does not even cover his out-of-pocket costs .. let alone his expenditure of $1,600,000 in plaintiffs' attorneys' time -- according to court filings.
3. The acidosis enhancing to cardiac arrest argument will not fly in the future ... do the homework and look to present information and new studies. The acidosis concern is a "pig" (study) problem, not a "human" study problem. And, no the two do not equate. Bottom line ... pepper spray, 60 seconds of one-on-one struggle, 200 yard dash (under 30 seconds), 30 seconds of pushups, etc. produce "FAR" more acidosis than TASER discharges.
4. You may also want to review the post Heston cases where TASER was dismissed on summary judgment (courts construing the facts in light most favorable to the plaintiffs) ... and read the court's orders granting TASER's motions for summary judgments (especially Lomax and Fairbanks)
5. Thus -- "go for it ...." keep the ignorance coming ... Eventually the science and the truth will come out and those continuing to spout the negative ignorant (lack of knowledge) media-driven senstionalistic rhetoric will be branded for what it is ....