Las Vegas Sun

February 9, 2010

Currently: 48° | Complete forecast | Log in

Sun editorial:

Blind contract

County did not question UMC’s agreement with doctor at center of hepatitis crisis

Friday, March 14, 2008 | 2:08 a.m.

University Medical Center on Tuesday canceled its contract with Dr. Dipak Desai, whose past medical decisions and procedures in his private practice are being investigated by health and law enforcement authorities.

Desai is majority owner of the Endoscopy Center of Southern Nevada, the now-closed Las Vegas clinic that health officials in January linked to a hepatitis C outbreak.

The public hospital could not continue with Desai after state inspectors observed unsafe medical procedures being performed by staff at his clinic, setting off a scare that as many as 40,000 patients could have been exposed to diseases.

But was the Desai contract appropriate in the first place? It is hard to know. As reported this week by the Las Vegas Sun’s Tony Cook, the Clark County Commission, which oversees UMC, never discussed it.

Desai had long held contracts with UMC for providing stomach and intestinal services before canceling the contracts (with 90 days’ notice) in March 2007. There were four separate contracts for himself, for two other doctors in his gastroenterology group and for his gastroenterology group itself.

Those contracts cost the hospital $210,000 annually.

UMC publicly sought proposals from other providers after Desai bowed out. Only two responses were received, from Desai and one from another medical group whose staff, the hospital decided, was too small.

In October, acting UMC Chief Executive Kathy Silver recommended recontracting with Desai, this time for one four-year contract at an annual cost averaging $1.05 million.

But was Desai’s new contract worth five times more than what the hospital had been paying the only option? Was the hospital being gouged by Desai because he had cornered the local market for gastroenterology services? Could the contract have been less by dividing it among smaller medical groups?

These are some of the questions the County Commission could have asked, but chose not to, in approving the contract. In this case the commission failed in its responsibility to act on behalf of taxpayers who pay the hospital’s bills.

Post a comment

Commenting requires registration.

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy.

If you would like to submit your comment as a letter to the editor, you may submit it here.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

OR Create an account (It's free)

Spotlight

Signing Day

Signing Day

Eight locals highlight first recruiting class at UNLV for new coach

Miss America

Miss America

Stories, photos and videos from this year's pageant

CES 2010

CES 2010

Full coverage of the International Consumer Electronics Show

CityCenter

CityCenter

The definitive guide to MGM Mirage's newest property

New Year's Eve

New Year's Eve

Full coverage of New Year's Eve 2009

Sights Unseen

Sights Unseen

A collection of our favorite images that didn't run in 2009

2020 Vision

2020 Vision

As a new decade begins, the Sun looks 10 years ahead

Bottoming Out

Bottoming Out

Gambling addiction in Las Vegas

Funny Face

Funny Face

Carrot Top's stage act a mask of contradictions

Renewable Energy

Renewable Energy

A detailed look at where renewable-energy sources are located in the state

A gamble in the sand

A gamble in the sand

The history of Las Vegas

Guest Gauge

Guest Gauge

The weekend crowd forecast for Las Vegas

  • Most Read
  • Discussed
  • Most E-mailed

Calendar »

  • 9 Tue
  • 10 Wed
  • 11 Thu
  • 12 Fri
  • 13 Sat