SUN EDITORIAL:
Missed opportunity
Scheduled inspections at tainted Endoscopy Center were put off for lack of staff
Sunday, March 9, 2008 | 3:08 a.m.
There is a possibility that unsafe procedures at the Endoscopy Center of Southern Nevada — procedures that have placed 40,000 people at risk for three potentially fatal blood diseases — could have been discovered during scheduled state inspections.
No one will ever know for sure, however, because the inspections never took place.
The Nevada agency in charge of inspecting medical facilities — the Nevada State Health Division’s Licensure and Certification Bureau — issued a memo in 2001 promising complete inspections every three years. But as reported Thursday by Las Vegas Sun reporter David McGrath Schwartz, the agency did not follow its own schedule.
The Endoscopy Center was not fully inspected in 2004, nor was it fully inspected in 2007. Bureau inspectors have visited the Endoscopy Center over the past several years, but only to review specific complaints.
Complete inspections, which could have revealed the employees’ routine violations of standard procedures for using syringes and medicine vials while administering anesthesia, were simply not conducted.
A full inspection was finally conducted in early January, after a hepatitis C cluster was traced back to the center. An ensuing, and ongoing, investigation revealed that patients since 2004 could have been exposed to the blood of another patient. Now, 40,000 former clients of the center need to have their blood tested periodically for hepatitis C, hepatitis B and HIV.
The bureau cited a lack of resources in explaining why it did not follow through on its inspection schedule. The Associated Press reported Friday that Gov. Jim Gibbons, in keeping with his campaign pledge to not raise taxes or fees, last year cut 10 new inspector positions from the bureau’s proposed budget. Ultimately the Legislature did approve six new inspector positions.
With assistance from federal agencies, the state is now rushing to observe medical procedures at all outpatient surgical centers. For the long term, however, state government must ensure that full inspections take place more frequently — and on schedule.
Discussion: comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- UNLV can move forward without the burden of losing streak to San Diego State
- A wife’s wisdom shows birth control issue needn’t be divisive
- Motorcycle accident claims life of man in northeast valley
- Surprise links, negotiated deals addressed by commissioners
- Hope and change and … what’s missing?
- We don’t need a CEO in charge
- New York mayor has the right idea
- Paying our own way
- Country has ‘given’ citizens a lot
- Jerry Tarkanian: Mike Moser impresses yet again on a day to remember former Rebel greats
Blogs
The Kats Report
Color from scene at Thomas & Mack: We have a wire job! Rebels win, and Louie Armstrong sings!
South Point owner Michael Gaughan's take on 'Vegas Stripped': 'I'll give it an 8' (4 Comments)
Author relishes writing the life story of ‘larger-than-life’ Oscar Goodman (3 Comments)
Elsewhere
Landowner: All roads could lead to Uxbridge casino
Revel reveals smoke-free casino opening
Cirque du Soleil show in Sands China casino to close this month
Meet the woman behind Sheldon Adelson
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.



So since the state also dropped the ball, are they liable for any damages to the people? This is outrageous to think that this could have been found much earlier, resulting in less victims. Isn't this what our tax money is supposed to be paying for? What good is a state agency that regulates standards in clinics if it never does it's job. Perhaps Desai threw some greenbacks their way also?
Lack of staff is the same reason the smoking ban isn't being enforced. Why have any health regs?
While State regulators should have been on the ball, it is just as shocking that the insurance carrier covering the malpractice and/or liability was not auditing this practice. After all, it is the insurance carrier who ultimately assumes the risk.
Does anybody know who the carrier is for Endoscopy Center of Southern Nevada?