SUN EDITORIAL:
A real nowhere bill
Latest Republican tactic to revive Yucca Mountain gives irresponsibility a new meaning
Sun, Jan 27, 2008 (2 a.m.)
One reason the federal plan to bury high-level nuclear waste at Yucca Mountain is moribund is because the science proving that it would be safe does not exist.
That presents a major problem for the Energy Department, which is intent upon submitting a license application for Yucca Mountain to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission by June 30.
Six Republican senators introduced a bill Thursday that would solve that problem for the Energy Department by essentially taking science off the table.
Under the bill, Yucca Mountain could be licensed for the first 300 years if the NRC “determines that there is a reasonable expectation that the health and safety of the public will be adequately protected.”
Only after 300 years have elapsed would scientists have to set a standard for how much radiation could escape the mountain for the duration of the waste’s lethal life, which would be at least 300,000 years.
We anticipated such a bill in 2004, after a federal court ruling.
The court found that the Energy Department had been obligated to follow the recommendation of the National Academy of Sciences in setting a radiation standard. The Academy had said the waste should be shielded enough, from the moment of burial, to protect the outside environment during the peak life of its deadly radiation — several hundred thousand years.
At the time, however, the Energy Department was trying, unsuccessfully, to prove the waste would be safe for 10,000 years. But the court left the department an out — it would withdraw its ruling if Congress would lift the requirement that the department take direction from the Academy.
That’s what this bill is intended to accomplish — substitute the Academy’s scientific ruling with a judgment call by the NRC. The bill, whose main sponsor is Sen. James Inhofe of Oklahoma, gives the words “reckless” and “irresponsible” new meanings.
Fortunately, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., the state’s leader in the fight against Yucca Mountain, is the one who will see that this bill goes where it belongs, which is nowhere.
Discussion: 1 comment so far…
Post a comment
Email Edition
- Most Read
- Discussed
- Most E-mailed
- Kathy Griffin carted off Las Vegas stage
- Fourth fireworks light up valley sky
- Ensign’s pal lacked usual qualifications for job as senator’s senior aide
- Cousins attracting attention from college football recruiters
- Jay-Z lights up Las Vegas, lives life to the max
- Popular in their cities, could Reno or Las Vegas mayor be governor?
- Las Vegas to sizzle for the Fourth
- With success of Singapore campus, UNLV eyes United Arab Emirates
- Strip performer is eBay high bidder for Elvis ring
- Henderson house fire displaces family of three
Blogs
The Bull's-Eye
Real drama follows Desert Classic victory by 'The Power' (UPDATED)
Elsewhere
Spike TV's 'UFC's Ultimate 100: Greatest Fights' airs tonight
The Kats Report
LV Phil 'Spectacular' at Springs Preserve was great -- for the music
Punchy Points: UFC 100
No. 6: The Ref: Dean relishes role, making right calls (1 Comment)
The Bull's-Eye
Canadian is first in Desert Classic's final four, Barney joins him (UPDATED) (2 Comments)
Sports: Upon Further Review
July 4 at Wimbledon
The Kats Report
It's the fourth, it's the Phil, but it is not fireworks
Calendar
- Backyard BBQ at Bare Pool with Steve Aoki ( to )
- Dubfire of Deepdish at Prive (10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.)
- Fourth of July party at Charlie’s Lakeside Casino (2 p.m. to 10 p.m.)
- Brooklyn Bridge Beer Bash at NYNY (noon to 11:59 p.m.)
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
Technorati
Just to clarify some points raised in Sunday's Yucca editorial "Nowhere Bill:" It is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency that must set the radiation safetl standard regulations for the repository at Yucca Mountain. EPA was ordered by the federal court to revise the rule in 2004. EPA issued a draft revision in 2005, but has yet to publish the final rule. The draft supplemental EIS issued by DOE last fall showed that the proposed repository will meet the standards set in the draft rule, but it will be up to yet another federal agency to make that determination in a licensing action yet to take place.
By the way, the National Academy of Sciences, in its 2003 report "One Step at a Time," endorsed the staged development concept for geologic repositorities which is an underying basis for the Inhofe legislation.