ODDS ‘N’ ENDS:
Jeff Haney points out the cheap line on the Pats to win
Friday, Feb. 1, 2008 | 2 a.m.
The relationship between the point spread in Sunday’s Super Bowl and its money line reveals perhaps the most attractive way to bet the big game — and a wager to avoid at all costs.
The Patriots are favored by 12 points against the Giants at Las Vegas sports books.
Yet the money line — for bets on which team will win the game outright, regardless of the point spread — on New England is as low as minus-420 (risk $4.20 to win $1) in Las Vegas, with prices from minus-430 to minus-450 readily available.
Money lines in that range represent a substantial discount from the odds usually attached to an NFL game with a point spread of 12 — and a good opportunity for bettors.
Establishing a money line is partly a function of the over/under, or expected number of points, in an NFL game, so there’s no hard and fast formula.
Typically, though, an NFL game with a point spread of 12 will carry a money line on the favorite of at least minus-700 at Las Vegas casinos.
In September’s game between the Chargers and the Chiefs, for example, San Diego was a 12-point favorite. Bettors had to lay between minus-725 and minus-800 on the Chargers on the money line, however.
Similarly, when the Patriots were favored by 12 against the Texans in December 2006, the money line was minus-700 on New England. The previous month, the Colts were favored by 12 against the Bills in a game that carried a money line of minus-800 on Indianapolis.
Sure, there is some “vigorish,” meaning the house’s cut of the action, built into those money lines. But the money line on the Patriots in Sunday’s Super Bowl still looks attractive compared with the “no-vig” line, or true odds, on an NFL team favored by 12, which comes out to about minus-650.
“Anything around 4-1 on the favorite is a great value,” Las Vegas sports handicapper Patrick Bartucci said, adding that he has personally played New England at minus-420 and might take a larger position if the money line drops further.
The reason Sunday’s money line is so out of whack has to do with the unique dynamics of Super Bowl betting.
More than any other football game, the Super Bowl attracts legions of casual fans looking to have fun and get in on the action, many probably making their only sports bet of the year.
In Las Vegas, those recreational bettors tend to play the underdog on the money line, hoping to triple their money but not realizing they should be demanding a return of at least five times their investment.
“All those small plays on the Giants really add up in the casinos,” Bartucci said.
Money lines of minus-420 or minus-430 were available midweek at many sports books, including Cal Neva joints, the Las Vegas Hilton, the Palms, Harrah’s properties, Station Casinos properties, the Plaza and the Stratosphere/Arizona Charlie’s books.
If New England on the money line is an advantageous bet for Super Bowl gamblers, the Giants on the money line is one to avoid — regardless of what all those casual bettors are playing.
The price on the Giants on the money line ranges from plus-325 (risk $1 to net $3.25) to plus-370 in Las Vegas. If you were betting a 12-point NFL underdog on the money line, however, you would normally expect odds of plus-550 to plus-650.
Betting the Giants on the money line in the Super Bowl would be like playing blackjack at one of those mutant tables that pays 6-5 on naturals rather than the traditional 3-2. Even if you win, you’re shortchanging yourself.
Discussion: comment so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- UNLV can move forward without the burden of losing streak to San Diego State
- A wife’s wisdom shows birth control issue needn’t be divisive
- Surprise links, negotiated deals addressed by commissioners
- Motorcycle accident claims life of man in northeast valley
- Hope and change and … what’s missing?
- New York mayor has the right idea
- We don’t need a CEO in charge
- Paying our own way
- Country has ‘given’ citizens a lot
- Jerry Tarkanian: Mike Moser impresses yet again on a day to remember former Rebel greats
Blogs
The Kats Report
Color from scene at Thomas & Mack: We have a wire job! Rebels win, and Louie Armstrong sings!
South Point owner Michael Gaughan's take on 'Vegas Stripped': 'I'll give it an 8' (4 Comments)
Author relishes writing the life story of ‘larger-than-life’ Oscar Goodman (3 Comments)
Elsewhere
Landowner: All roads could lead to Uxbridge casino
Revel reveals smoke-free casino opening
Cirque du Soleil show in Sands China casino to close this month
Meet the woman behind Sheldon Adelson
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.



I agreed completely with your logic on betting the Pats to win. Was kicking myself for not taking the easy money.
I guess I'm fortunate that one of my new years resolutions is to no longer bet sports, because of nights like these. Tonight's upset would have been frustrating.