Facebook
Fark
Digg
Reddit
Stumble
Sunday, Aug. 31, 2008 | 2 a.m.
In August, Brian Greenspun turns over the Where I Stand column to guest writers. Today’s columnist is Terry Lanni, chairman and chief executive of MGM Mirage.
You’ve likely read in the Las Vegas Sun about an initiative to raise the room tax rate by one-third, or 33 1/3 percent, to raise $150 million annually, which will go the first year to the general fund and then to teachers’ salaries in perpetuity.
While we unequivocally support funding for education, this narrowly crafted proposal comes when our state budget is facing unprecedented cutbacks in every area including public safety and prisons, higher education, senior assistance, health care, child services and roadway construction.
While a room tax should be part of the solution to increase revenues, this proposal has several weaknesses:
• It doesn’t come close to fixing the $1.2 billion budget deficit, which may well rise even higher.
• It earmarks these funds, preventing elected leaders from addressing potentially more pressing financial needs.
• It simply extends our commitment to a broken tax system, one that has failed us for years.
Additionally, why are we asking tourists, whose children don’t attend classes in Nevada, to pay exclusively for teacher salaries? Where are our bankers, our retailers, our car dealers and other large businesses whose children go to school locally?
Here in Nevada, companies large and small have profited from vibrant growth and expansion for almost eight consecutive decades. When the state was smaller and its needs less complex, the policy established 75 years ago in which the gaming industry paid tax on gross revenues seemed to meet everyone’s wishes.
The gaming industry paid taxes in large amounts and others didn’t. Gaming was a much bigger portion of the state’s economy and provided the lion’s share of the tax revenue.
But while Nevada has seen, especially in the past 30 years, the development of far greater financial demands, our tax structure remains much the same as it was in the 1930s.
Since the 1970s political and community leaders began to look at potential solutions to addressing the increasing need for taxes. Study after study was commissioned, each one offering dire predictions if the state continued to rely so much on a single source of revenue: the gaming industry.
I believe it is important to make clear that tax policy in Nevada is not about gaming versus every other business in the state. Any one of us knows that in today’s social and economic climate, no one industry can be held responsible for providing for the needs of this ever more complex state.
History has proved that if you base revenues on single-source taxes that defy predictability, you will consistently run into trouble. Each of our past four governors has faced the need to make cuts in the state’s budget because our overreliance on gaming and sales taxes proved unreliable.
We must fix this flawed system and the solution must come from within the business community.
The time came long ago for every large business that benefits from operating in this state to share in the responsibility of educating our children and providing its fair share of funds for the state’s needs.
While we must protect small businesses and give them the chance to grow and thrive, the rest of us — gaming and nongaming — need to step up. We have to find the resolve to overcome political obstacles and accept the fact that a no-tax business environment is a relic of a bygone era.
Let’s create a stable, predictable large-business tax structure, one on which we can build a Nevada for future generations.
The most fair and straightforward means to achieving this objective is not to create a new tax, but to increase the existing Modified Business Tax, building in an exemption for small businesses. This will allow large businesses to participate in funding the services they require to be successful and allow us all to develop and maintain an appropriate quality of life in Nevada. Let me be clear: The gaming industry will also continue to pay the largest share of taxes in this state.
If we don’t take action today, we are guaranteeing continued chaos for future generations. We have the ability to change Nevada from a state where economic and social planning extends only to the next political season into a state where we provide properly for future generations.
In the next several months I’ll work to develop and refine this concept with my like-minded colleagues in the gaming and nongaming business community who believe the state of our state is deteriorating to unacceptable levels.
But, we must all face up to the reality of Nevada’s needs in a new century.
It’s up to us. And the time is now.
Mr Lanni wants to kill public employee retirement benefits while acting like a champion of state funded programs like education. Actually, he wants his name on a school so he is coming forward at this time to promote business assistance to programs like education, but does he really care about education for our children? I think not.
His interest is the gaming industry and wants to protect that industries inside track to minimum taxes, garnering huge profits so that expansion elsewhere in the U.S. and foreign countries can continue. He prefers that other businesses pick up the slack where the gamining industry fails to contribute.
While he continues the montra that the gaming industry pays the largest share of taxes it is not nearly enough compared to what these mega-resorts pay in other U.S. states, McCow, Hong Kong, etc., etc. They are cheap and do not care one iota about the poor state of education in Nevada, let alone Clark County where they reap the biggest benefits and profits even in hard economic times.
Good luck on your school naming drive as I am sure you are kissing up to and holding hands with Walt Rulffes and the 6 grandmothers on the present school board. They just made it easier for guys like you to have a school named for them, but more difficult, if not impossible to name a single H.S. for the real heroes of this county, the war veterans,
When you want less of something tax it. Let's raise the tax on visitors (whose numbers are dropping daily) and see if we can get the numbers down more. That also will mean less taxes from all other sources as vacancy rates go up, gaming taxes decline, and sales taxes dwindle. It also means less jobs so those workers wont have to pay taxes either. Balancing taxes with keeping the economy running is not just a federal problem, its state and local as well. We need less taxes in this state and country, NOT more.
Is this an OP-ED piece?
Just the other day, the Sun editorial was barking about the need to diversify the Nevada economy.
Raising taxes only on non-gaming would discourage diversification of the economy.
I guess they can not make up their mind.
Also, raising taxes on companies that are hurting is dumb. How many more private employees need to be laid off?
Also, this imaginary law would have to be complex to pull off. Is it based on revenue? So if a company loses millions then they will have to laid off employees to pay the tax.
Lastly, none of the Democrats are openly supporting any tax increase. We all know that all Democrats always want to raise taxes. Today, they are hiding under the rocks.
Next year after the election, you will hear them bark left and right about the need to "fix the tax structure".
It is this simple. If you want private entities to lay off employees to pay radical new tax increases then vote Democrat.
If you do not want radical new tax increases and want to protect non-public employees then vote Republican.
Wow..wow...wow. As you read this please keep in mind that Mr. Lanni and his long list of hotel/casino properties funneled thousands upon thousands of dollars in campaign donations to our now infamously incapable Governor Gibbons. Why would Mr. Lanni want so badly to help elect this Governor, knowing full well of the Governor's "No New Tax" pledge, then stand by silently while the Governor cut our health care and education programs mercilessly, if he really cared about improving education and expanding our tax base? Credibility is really important here my fellow Sun readers...I smell a stinker. Mr. Lanni just doesn't want to lose room tax revenue and that's what this article is all about, he's a Gibbonsite - despite how he presents himself here. Readers beware!
I live in Virginia and I have an idea. Why don't you tax the people who need the schools and services for which you need the funds? You're going to have to do it sooner or later. In the the distant past you had a "gambleing industrial park" that required little in the way of social services. Now you're swamped with familes that don't even gamble but have plenty of needs in the way of municipal services.
OR just tell the masses that you're not going to provide the services they desire. There's no free lunch, or free municipal services.
Raising corporate taxes is bad for Nevada's economy, it will retard growth and diversification, but it may be good for casinos.
http://npri.org/blog/he-didnt-get-the-me...