Editorial: That’ll be $600 billion
Sunday, Oct. 7, 2007 | 7:22 a.m.
Coming first to mind when thinking of President Bush's tragically false pronouncements while he was whipping up support for his war are these: Iraq has weapons of mass destruction and plans to use them; Iraq collaborated with the 9/11 terrorists.
But there was at least one other statement comparable with those two in terms of its falsity. Bush administration budget officials estimated that the total financial cost of the war would be in the $60 billion range.
As the country knows now, of course, a zero would have to be added to that estimate to achieve a much more accurate figure - for just the cost so far.
His gross mischaracterization of the war's cost has not really emerged as an issue because no one is yet paying. Instead of doing the right thing - asking this generation of Americans to pay the war's bills - Bush is simply letting them pile up.
To do otherwise would be to ask the country at large, not just the troops and their families, to share in the sacrifice. Had Bush been forthright about war and its costs, he would have needed to seek tax increases, not tax breaks. And Bush has never wanted to do that ... something about elections.
We can't help but wonder if Bush's support for the war would have collapsed long ago if a fair-sounding plan put forth by three House Democrats last week had been in place all along.
Rather than dumping the costs of the war onto our grandchildren, Reps. David Obey of Wisconsin, John Murtha of Pennsylvania and Jim McGovern of Massachusetts suggested paying for the war ourselves, right now.
They proposed tacking an Iraq war surcharge onto federal income taxes. Tax bills for low- and middle-income Americans would increase by 2 percent, and wealthier Americans would see increases of between 12 percent and 15 percent.
We understand that, politically, the proposal will go nowhere.
But if the proposal were adopted, it would be interesting to see how many current war supporters would become critics once some sacrifice came their way.
archive
- Most Read
- Discussed
- Most E-mailed
- Man, 26, dies in collision with truck traveling at 100 mph
- MGM Mirage: CityCenter not affected by debt woes
- Metro admits to improper release of criminal history data
- Locomotives win inaugural UFL championship
- Was a foiled bank heist a cry for help?
- If Palin’s book is so bad, then why is it a best-seller?
- Bargain hunters hit stores for Black Friday
- Q&A: MMA fighter and Playboy model Latasha Marzolla
- Wonder drug for men flops, suggestive ad campaign coming under scrutiny
- UNLV recalls last year’s close shave at Louisville
Blogs
The Kats Report
Could a savior of shuttered Las Vegas Art Museum be ... Peter Max? (6 Comments)
For Paul Stanley and KISS, rock and roll is not over (6 Comments)
Twenty years ago today, Human Nature took root on the farm (1 Comment)
Robin Leach's Las Vegas Celebrity Watch
Photo Gallery: Donny Osmond’s triumphant return to the Flamingo
The Kats Report
'DWTS' champ Donny Osmond still deft afoot in return to Flamingo (8 Comments)
Politics: The Early Line
Meeting of GOP governors draws challengers, not Gibbons (5 Comments)
Politics: Ralston's Flash
Oscar loves forcing developers to sign labor peace agreements, Culinary loves the city's downtown plans and all is forgiven (10 Comments)
Calendar »
- 29 Sun
- 30 Mon
- 1 Tue
- 2 Wed
- 3 Thu
-
Tahoe Takeover at The Bank
The Bank | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
Playboy Club model search
Playboy Club | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
Queen of Queens at Revolution Lounge
Beatles Revolution Lounge | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
Zowie Bowie's Vintage Vegas Show at Monte Carlo
Lance Burton Theater
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
Technorati









