Letter: Best coverage is none at all
Wednesday, Sept. 11, 2002 | 9:04 a.m.
There has been a great deal of discussion in the last few weeks about the propriety and necessity of extensive media coverage of the first anniversary of the terrorist attacks of 9-11.
It seems to me that the most responsible coverage would be no coverage at all. If we want to encourage future attacks, the best way is to show that those attacks have had a profound effect on our lives. To publicize negative reactions is to portray the attacks as highly effective, thereby providing aid and comfort to the enemy.
We need to, instead, show that we have not been particularly affected.
WALLACE J. HENKELMAN
archive
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- Celebrity preview: Kim Kardashian, Playboy Club, Miss USA, Glen Campbell, burlesque
- Mayweather trades spotlight for jail cell as 90-day sentence begins
- Casino game-testing company expanding Las Vegas operations
- At a glance: Lawsuits filed against Floyd Mayweather Jr.
- With Shenandoah project stalled, Newton hits back legally






Facebook Connect