Las Vegas Sun

May 18, 2013

Currently: 87° | Complete forecast | Log in

Sandoval suggests ‘significantly higher’ fees for higher ed students

Published Wednesday, Jan. 5, 2011 | 6:28 p.m.

Updated Wednesday, Jan. 5, 2011 | 6:28 p.m.

Brian Sandoval

Brian Sandoval

Gov. Brian Sandoval has suggested that students pay “significantly higher fees” to attend Nevada colleges and universities, higher education officials said Wednesday.

Chancellor Dan Klaich and Board of Regents Chairman James Dean Leavitt met with the governor and his senior staff in Carson City. They were unable to share many details of the conversation, including how large a budget cut Sandoval will recommend.

“The reality we’re facing as a state and a system of higher education is bleak,” Leavitt said. “The meeting was cordial. But we were not shy. We told him about the sustained, difficult, deep cuts we’ve suffered over the past two sessions. We told him further cuts would cause irreparable damage to the system.”

Leavitt said students “should expect significantly higher fees.” He wouldn’t be more specific, saying “significant is scary enough.”

Sandoval ran on a platform of balancing the state’s budget by not raising taxes or fees. He argued that families and businesses cannot afford to pay more in this economy.

Heidi Gansert, Sandoval’s chief of staff, said Nevada institutions have low tuition rates compared to similar colleges and universities.

“I think it’s important we have access to higher education, which we do, but look at how Nevada compares to other universities. Our tuition is rather low,” she said.

Sandoval also believes that any increase in tuition should be coupled with scholarship programs or increased access for students to get federal aid, she said.

Klaich said the governor’s administration has not come to a final decision about how big a cut higher education will take but said Sandoval suggested increasing fees “without affecting access to institutions.”

Sandoval will release his budget on Jan. 24. The Legislature has 120 days to pass the budget, though any tuition increase is likely to have to be passed by the Board of Regents, which is independently elected.

Sandoval’s predecessor, Gov. Jim Gibbons, proposed a 37 percent cut to higher education in 2009, which was rejected by lawmakers. Gibbons’ staff also pointed out that the higher education system could offset those cuts by increasing tuition and fees. The board of regents did increase fees in 2009.

Average in-state tuition is about $5,600 per year for the University of Nevada, Las Vegas and University of Nevada, Reno, excluding books, room and board, lab fees and other costs, according to a higher education spokesman. Average tuition for the College of Southern Nevada is $2,243.

Discussion: 56 comments so far...

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. So students and their parents get to get buried in debt to pay more for college. I guess we can just bite the bullet.
    A 37% increase in tuition this semester wasn't enough Governor?
    As our "New Governor" takes care of his friends by reducing their tax burden for next year, the future educated workers and leaders of this state get screwed.
    We have one of the lowest tax burdens in the United States. Why isn't the Governor looking at raising taxes the same way he is going to raise tuition??
    Maybe his spokeswoman has an answer for that question?
    I doubt it, remember "No new taxes"

  2. This guy really doesn't get it. On the one hand he says that Nevadans can't afford to pay more, then he proposes shifting more of the burden of paying for college to us. I have a daughter enrolled in a state university, and I am also a state employee. Sounds like I'm going to get the shaft from both directions.

  3. Someone should tell him that making higher education less accessible is not the way to develop new industries in NV.

    Companies don't like to do business somewhere there isn't a pool of qualified talent to hire. Recruiting employees from out of state is difficult and relocation is expensive.

  4. >>Gov. Brian Sandoval has suggested that students pay "significantly higher fees" to attend Nevada colleges and universities, higher education officials said Wednesday.<<

    On day one Sandogibbons causes a constitutional crisis with his order regarding reading (see the RJ's article on it by Ed vogel in today's edition). On day two he breaks his pledge to raise taxes or fees by stating that fees need to be raised for all students who want to attend college. This, while companies like IKEA refuse to move here after being courted by the LVCVA because while the taxes on businesses are nice, the education system is too poor.

    Where are the Republicans and Tea Baggers now? He broke his word to not raise taxes or fees! And businesses are refusing to move here BECAUSE the education system, which he thinks should be more expensive and exclusive, is in bad condition.

    Wow.

  5. "tuition is low" is that a bad thing? I guess you can't go any lower than 50th in education.

  6. Governor B.S.
    Ascending to the throne, and kicking his subjects on the way up...NICE!!!

    I see we have a true successor to our just deposed Education Governor.

  7. I hope that if tuition at UNLV and CSN is to be raised, the Governor will force the University's Presidents to take a sharp knife to carve the fat out of the university's and the college's budgets.

    AT UNLV there are far too many tenured professors teaching useless subjects while earning very high pay and benefits. At CSN the degree requirements mandate the taking of incredibly useless classes, merely to obtain an AA. In both cases, by useless I mean subjects which will NOT allow students to attain marketable job skills.

    UNLV does not need to be UC Berkeley or UCLA. CSN does not need to be Cal State Northridge.

    What UNLV and CSN do need to do is provide the course work necessary to obtain a decent paying job IN NEVADA. Nevada's employers should not have to import people from out of state.

    In the 1970's students could choose and pay for courses which had direct application to their job goals, and did not have to waste their money subsidizing the comfortable lifestyles of academics and educators who taught nothing but useless junk. Now days, if you look at the "mandatory" course list at CSN, for example, you see that at least half of what students are required to take during their "2 years" is totally unrelated to the work environment.

    I've spent enough time, as a hiring partner in my company, to say with great confidence that a boatload of b.s. humanities courses, at college level, is not going to get anyone a job at my company, or virtually anywhere else in Nevada.

    Accounting, not philosophy.

    Writing for business, not "studies of womens literature in the 20th Century".

  8. FINALLY! He speaks!

    Make higher education less accessible by increasing its cost.

    I'll notify the The Daily Beast immediately that we will be retaining the heavyweight belt for

    "Dumbest City in the Land"...until further notice!

    LOL!!! This just keeps getting better and better.

    If I die in 2011, at least my spirit be laughing all the way to the morgue!!!!!

    Thanks Brian...I needed that.

  9. Students pay for Wall Street theft. Lets not tax the thieves - they give us jobs!!!
    It's easy to see that a Republican Governor is back in office.

  10. Nice job Sandoval. Kenny Guinn is rolling over in his grave.

  11. Let's try this: Instead of raising fees, lower them to, say, $200 per quarter. That way, every kid who wants to go to college, can work his or her way through school. They would graduate without substantial debt. That way businesses would have a pool of young college graduates who could work for low wages (no debt) and the state would have consumers (no debt) who could pay sales and property taxes. New businesses are attracted here, the job market improves, property values stabilize, and we generate more state and local revenue without raising tax rates.

    The other option is the new Governor's, we can raise fees, drive people from college, drive businesses away, make the job market worse, drive property values down further, and generate less state and local revenue, having to further cut services or raising taxes, which drives more business activity away, and spiral down....

    Our choice.

  12. It would not be that hard to save some money in the budget at UNLV. We have paid for a few of our children to go there over the years.

    First off would be to get rid of the nonsense courses that are not needed for the degree but required so inflate the cost of education.

    Second would be to require professors to show up and teach their classes more often. To often we would receive a call from one of our kids saying there is a note on the door stating the professor would not be there today, just a homework assignment would be given. Sometimes an "aid" would be there to take the place of the professor.

    This happened way to often. Why should we be paying for classes that never happen?

    Our new governor is going to shift costs to cities, counties and the public but he won't raise taxes.

  13. I won't raise taxes but I will make it financially impossible for the middle class to get ahead. Do elected officials, especially the Republican ones, ever get tired of screwing the middle and lower economic classes -- EVER?????

  14. Promise not to raise taxes, but raise "fees"??? These "fees" of which there are many, not just relating to higher education, are, let's get real here, regressive taxes on the middle income and lower. The wealthy are not going to be sending Junior to UNLV or CSN, even if he is not a stellar student. Not to pick on our illustrious former president GW Bush, but he springs to mind, he was not an academic superstar yet he got into Yale, where, by his own admission he was a "C" student. Yet, despite this he got admitted to Harvard Business School's MBA program. My point, Governor B.S. is going to attempt to narrow the budget gap on the backs of middle class Nevadans, by increasing "fees" (taxes) that the middle class pay so as not to increase taxes on his wealthy corporate masters.

  15. Bad move Brian.

    These kids need a bit of schooling in order to grow. Whacking our finest sends a pretty clear message about whom you aim to help and whom you aim to hinder, hamstring, hamper and hobble.

    Bye bye manana.

  16. @nancyb: Great suggestion. Our bright or ambitious kids will pick a state with good schools, move in, get a job, and qualify of the in-state tuition in that state, get an education, and stay there. Problem solved. The kids who stay here can make beds, polish floors, serve drinks, and work in the sex trade. No education needed for that, so we could save money by cutting out school altogether after the 4th grade. Budget Balanced.

  17. Coddle the corporate interests that funded his election, and screw the students. All you folks who voted for this Republican stooge -- do any of you have kids in college, or kids planning to go to college? Get ready to open the pocket book. But look on the bright side -- no new taxes! That is, if you don't consider large tuition hikes a "tax."

    This nation is about 14th in the world in per-capita college graduates. We were #1 in the 1970's.

    So the solution to regain America's educational standing is too make it even harder for people to attend college?

  18. I betcha the number of schoolteachers who are living here now and who have recently begun a search in earnest for work elsewhere far outnumbers the number of schoolteachers elsewhere looking elsewhere in earnest.

    They see the wave a'comin and can hear the moaning, the sighing of the sea.

  19. I'll trade you three pounds of sand today for one millenium scholarship in 2014.

  20. hey cynical observer,

    you're missing out if you're excluding folks who may diversify a bit.

    For example, a friend of mine, John Meyer, was a bleeding heart English major who wanted to become a doctor and figure out how they died. So after smashing a bunch of bodies up on the football field as a safety for the #1 ranked University of Missouri Tigers for a few years, John doctors now. I saw him on TV after the Jon Benet Ramsey thing; he was the fella who had to examine the corpse.

    He did what most people don't even want to think about. And he came on TV and said what a horrible disgusting thing it was that happened to that child. Same guy I knew back in the 60s reading dumb poetry and unimportant stuff like Shakespeare and studying Art and Music and Architecture and History and of course acing Physics, Organic Chem, Anatomy, Physiology, and every other thing in his path so he could figure it all out.

    You could be making the Henry Miller mistake:"Anything we deny, despise or denigrate serves only to defeat us in the end."

  21. Listen to the Liberals bleat.

    Have those quarter-of-a-million dollar to half-million dollar coaches at UNLV pay for educating the kids.

    It was public money that build the college sports and the public ought to be getting the money back from sport revenue not enriching coaches.

    If they want an education after high school and can't afford to pay for their own, there are plenty of government grants. Otherwise open the public libraries so people can get the greatest of education, self-education.

    BLEAT!

  22. Recent testimony in state legislative committees revealed that Nevada students havs a 70% expectation to NOT graduating high school. Maybe this is the new Gov's compromise... sustain our higher Ed with out of state tuition, or just close the colleges, cause no one in NV will be going there anyway. Of the 30% of Nevada kids who do graduate... how many will go out of state if they can?

  23. This makes it cheaper for all the military people at Nellis to send their dependents out of state to college. Trust me, I have two sons at CSN who should be attending UNLV next semester. If these increases go into effect, they'll be going to our permanent state of residency instead - to BETTER universities!

    If an entire population (military) leaves, the increase in fees could mean a net loss ... correct?

Post a comment

Commenting requires registration.

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy.

If you would like to submit your comment as a letter to the editor, you may submit it here.

Most Popular