Richardson's agenda was in more detail and in length than any of the other candidates. He was progressive, particularly in education and the environment. As just one example, his education plan included various types of therapies (including music therapy) in our schools for special needs students. When you see something like that, you know you have found a candidate that knows what's up. I am hoping we will not see that last of Richardson at the national level.....VP with Obama!!!???

I have been wondering why a teachers union would back a candidate (Clinton) with no agenda on education. I have heard all of the candidates (except Kucinich) multiple times in Iowa; Clinton was the only one who did not address education. Last time I was on her website there was no agenda for education. What is driving this education union to this lawsuit?