- Most Read
- Discussed
- Most E-mailed
- Woman arrested in fatal stabbing at Bally’s
- Halverson’s condition improving after husband’s attack
- Man arrested for attempted sexual assault
- Buyout keeps Cosmopolitan in play
- Why attack on city bus met inaction
- Palin energizes skeptical base
- Fire at Land Rover dealership under investigation
- Officers fatally shoot man wanted in Clark County burglaries
- Las Vegas trio guilty of drug trafficking in Hawaii
- DMV employee arrested in Las Vegas on federal bribery charges
Blogs
Bloggity, Bloggity, Bloggity
Carl Edwards caption contest (3 Comments)
Sports: UNLV
Athlon ranks UNLV basketball at No. 24
Culture Blog
Las Vegas Philharmonic will back Placido Domingo
Sports: UNLV
UNLV hires Manarino to coach softball
Bloggity, Bloggity, Bloggity
NASCAR drivers included on list of 50 most hated sports figures (2 Comments)
Winning The West
McCain energizes Republicans (9 Comments)
Protesters interrupt McCain (18 Comments)
Culture Blog
Welcome back to (a cooler) First Friday
Calendar
- "The New Generation" boxing match at Star of the Desert Arena (5:30 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.)
- Alice Cooper's Psycho-Drama Tour at the Orleans Showroom (8 p.m. to 11 p.m.)
- Farr Beyond Driven at the Cheyenne Saloon (10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.)
- Brian Culbertson at Santa Fe Station (8 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.)
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.


With all respect to the families, friends and co-workers of the deceased, I disagree with many of the comments posted. The responsibility for worker safety and the site belongs to the property owner, construction manager, general contractor, subcontractor, employer and workers. State and/or Federal OSHA are not adequately staffed and are incapable of inspecting and controlling all work sites within their jurisdiction. They are also limitted as to their ability to shut down an unsafe site or work activity. The facts are that owners don't want to pay additional costs for adequate staffing by dedicated safety personnel. Construction Managers and General Contractors are reluctant to add dedicated safety staff if not reimbursed for the expense. Safety management is delegated to the project super who is also responsible for schedule and production delay. Talk about a conflict! Safety personnel are viewed by the employer as an overhead expense that delays work and eats profit. Unions are protective of unsafe workers, refuse to comply with items like 6 foot mandatory fall protection, substance abuse testing, etc. The worker is heavily involved in this equation. Sometimes out of fear of being terminated; poor training;lack of knowledge; and their own apathetic attitude, short cuts and bad habits, they place themselves and others in jeopardy. The law and regulatory agencies are no less responsible as the law has no teeth or those who administer it are reluctant to enforce it when teeth are available. The insurance companies who insure these projects do not mandate that their clients properly staff and enforce safety requirements on the job. As for safety personnel, I understand the comment but if your concern is the safety of the worker, you will not turn your back on issues, even if it costs your employment. THAT is YOUR job! Worker's will continue to die and suffer injuries that are worse than death until everyone steps up to the plate and actively accepts, enforces and discharges their responsibilities. Where they are not applied with diligence, criminal and civil charges should be vigorously pursued and I am adding negligent workers into that group.