It's good to learn that a dirty and dangerous coal plant built in the last century is finally required to comply with the law, particularly after decades of endangering our health with impunity. However, the Sun's headline on this one escapes me. How does a singular comment about a long-delayed investment in pollution control being more cost effective than paying for the health costs of pollution constitute "Greens praise"? You might want to interview some of the clean energy advocates opposing the nearby Toquop coal plant.