Comments by user: ltndncr59
- Most Read
- Discussed
- Most E-mailed
- Corrections officer with Metro killed in U.S. 95 crash
- The pull of a drug, a push to the brink
- Was there an ulterior motive in parking the stripper-mobile?
- Harry Reid’s hopes hitched to health care reform bill
- CityCenter hotel welcomes new employees with gala
- Reid clears major health care hurdle, daunting weeks ahead
- Notebook: The Shark and LJ circle
- Politicians waste no time spinning latest jobless numbers
- Forrest Griffin writes his own ending at UFC 106
- Willis makes big difference in UNLV’s 78-69 victory
Blogs
Culture and Entertainment
UFC 106 walk-in music: Griffin changes his tune, secures win over Ortiz
The Kats Report
For props, Lewis Black needs only his manic delivery and torrid material (9 Comments)
Elsewhere
Sands China raises $2.5 billion in Hong Kong IPO (2 Comments)
Marquardt v. Sonnen scheduled for UFC 109
Bloggity, Bloggity, Bloggity
Will a fourth consecutive title by Jimmie Johnson be good or bad for NASCAR? (4 Comments)
Top Chef: Las Vegas
The Jet Stream: And then there were four
Top Chef Episode 12: On keeping it simple
- Live chat
- Tuesday, noon PST
- Chat with Krista Creelman
- Problem Gambling Center executive director Krista Creelman will answer questions about gambling addiction from Las Vegas Sun readers from noon to 1 p.m. Tuesday, Nov. ... Submit question
Calendar »
- 23 Mon
- 24 Tue
- 25 Wed
- 26 Thu
- 27 Fri
-
The Automatic Tour at The Square Apple
The Square Apple
-
Football specials at Diablo's
Diablos Cantina
-
DJ Red at Tabu
Tabú Ultralounge | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
Okay. Who's handling the class action civil suit? My entire family is affected by this. I hope that there will be criminal charges filed as well. A member of my family has had two procedures done at this chop-shop within the time parameters. Now we both have to undergo tests. Who is going to pay for these tests? If we test positive, who is going to pay for our care? Yes, I have insurance, through the company I work for, but it is certainly not a policy I would have bought for myself. They are so Scrooge-like that I have to fight with them every time I have a routine doctor's visit.
This whole, disgusting thing is of course bottom-lined by greed. They saved a few bucks by subjecting their patients to life-threatening complications. 40,000 patients is not an innocent oversight. A decision was made by someone, and carried out by several others. In this day and age, who would even consider re-using needles to be a safe practice?
Outrage does not begin to convey how I feel when I think of the adders that head and staff our health care facilities in this state. How do we fight it, especially now that UHC is going to have a virtual monopoly here?