Comments by user: knagl
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- Dina Titus dares to cross Harry Reid, maneuvers for Democratic safe seat
- Photos: Lauren Conrad celebrates her 26th birthday at Hyde Bellagio
- Grammy Awards struggle with honoring Whitney Houston
- Investigators seek answers to Whitney Houston’s death
- Photos: The late, great Whitney Houston is the soundtrack of my life
- Vegas gala to celebrate Muhammad Ali’s 70th birthday, benefit Ruvo Center
- Strip Scribbles: Is ‘Dancing With the Stars’ at Tropicana on again?
- List of Grammy winners in select major categories
- Abiding by tax law is not praiseworthy
- A personal tribute and a plea: Memories of Whitney Houston
Blogs
Elsewhere
Caesars' unit extends term loan maturity
The Kats Report
Color from scene at Thomas & Mack: We have a wire job! Rebels win, and Louie Armstrong sings!
South Point owner Michael Gaughan's take on 'Vegas Stripped': 'I'll give it an 8' (5 Comments)
Author relishes writing the life story of ‘larger-than-life’ Oscar Goodman (3 Comments)
Elsewhere
Landowner: All roads could lead to Uxbridge casino
Revel reveals smoke-free casino opening
Cirque du Soleil show in Sands China casino to close this month
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
Steve Zanella from MGM tries to compare server-based gaming to coinless ticket-in ticket-out (TITO) technology, saying that he expects the public to embrace the technology.
TITO had advantages for the gambler. No waiting on empty hoppers, fewer hand-pays, no dirty coins to handle, etc. I'm not sure that I see big advantages for the gambler when the house has the ability to tweak payout percentages on a whim.
The old wives' tale of "they make the machines tighter on the weekends" may actually now become reality with this technology. How does that appeal to the average gambler? Why would the average gambler embrace this technology?