Hillary is a farce. Bill was elected promising universal health care. The Congress was democratic. Eighty percent of the public was behind it. The economy could easily support it. Yet her program was 1000% failure. She had another 6 years to try to revive it. Nothing happened. Let's hear the excuse for 8 years of failure on her supposed pet program - when her husband was the president no less. Have you heard of anything that incompetent. Now there's an election, she's promising you healthcare again just like Bill did - with an unworkable mandatory plan. The theory is that if you can fool them once, you can always fool them. Get it? She thinks you're an idiot. As Geffen says, "the Clintons lie with such ease, it's troubling". and the NY Times' William Safire called her a "congenital liar". Hillary flunked healthcare. She flunked Iraq. She flunked Iran. She flunked Pakistan. She even flunked the Washington bar exam twice, and is a serial failure as a housewife. That's her record on important matters - her so-called experience. She cannot even take care of her household, but wants to be president, and leader of the free world, with her fingers on the nuclear arsenal. Would you bet on an old horse that in its younger days collapsed every time it came out of the gate? Bill is a huge security risk to the USA as he is susceptible to anything that comes along in a skirt. We cannot have a sexual predator running around the White House, with a hysterical nutcase in charge. We need intelligent and honest leadership. Obama is a brilliant and visionary leader with a powerful brain. He graduated first in his class at Harvard. That's not easy. He's a uniter that gets all the difficult things right.

Hillary went out of her way to bring race into the campaign. After the Iowa loss, she was going down fast in New Hampshire by all indications. She had played the gender card to the hilt, and was seemingly still losing. Next trick was to stir up racism. So the last message she wanted to get out is that people should vote for her because she is white - and forget about the unimportant Martin Luther King. She will find every possible subtle way to divide the country on race, and keep that up front on people's minds, in the hope that they will then choose her over Obama. Attacking Martin Luther King is a way of writing off the black vote, in the hopes that whites will vote based on race, thus giving her more votes. Would she have said "It took a man to give women the right to vote?" - in the way that she said of Dr. King and the Civil Rights Act that "It took a president to get it done.” No, because Susan B. Anthony would turn over in her grave, and women's groups would see her as deranged trash. In essence she was saying to Barack that he should be a servile Uncle Tom that should leave it up to white people to get the job done. This is white supremacist propagandising that the media fails to point out. Her statement could have no other meaning - if so, let's hear it. Is that what the Democratic Party wants for leadership?

Hillary went out of her way to bring race into the campaign. After the Iowa loss, she was going down fast in New Hampshire by all indications. She had played the gender card to the hilt, and was seemingly still losing. Next trick was to stir up racism. So the last message she wanted to get out is that people should vote for her because she is white - and forget about the unimportant Martin Luther King. She will find every possible subtle way to divide the country on race, and keep that up front on people's minds, in the hope that they will then choose her over Obama. Attacking Martin Luther King is a way of writng off the black vote, in the hopes that whites will vote simply on race, thus giving her more votes. Would she have said "It took a man to give women the right to vote?" - in the way that she said of Dr. King and the Civil Rights Act that "It took a president to get it done.” No, because Susan B. Anthony would turn over in her grave, and women's groups would see her as deranged trash. In essence she was saying to Barack that he should be a servile Uncle Tom that should leave it up to white people to get the job done. This is white supremacist propagandising that the media fails to point out. Her statement could have no other meaning - if so, let's hear it. Is that what the Democratic Party wants for leadership?