Comments by user: judes
slbk:
With 4000 caucus goers per site, you need to divide by 35, not 30. Also, you need to divide by (10446 + # of delegates from at large sites), as opposed to just 10,446.
The result would then be 8.95%.
Regards,
Jude
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- Dina Titus dares to cross Harry Reid, maneuvers for Democratic safe seat
- Photos: Lauren Conrad celebrates her 26th birthday at Hyde Bellagio
- Grammy Awards struggle with honoring Whitney Houston
- Investigators seek answers to Whitney Houston’s death
- Photos: The late, great Whitney Houston is the soundtrack of my life
- Vegas gala to celebrate Muhammad Ali’s 70th birthday, benefit Ruvo Center
- Strip Scribbles: Is ‘Dancing With the Stars’ at Tropicana on again?
- List of Grammy winners in select major categories
- Abiding by tax law is not praiseworthy
- A personal tribute and a plea: Memories of Whitney Houston
Blogs
Elsewhere
Caesars' unit extends term loan maturity
The Kats Report
Color from scene at Thomas & Mack: We have a wire job! Rebels win, and Louie Armstrong sings!
South Point owner Michael Gaughan's take on 'Vegas Stripped': 'I'll give it an 8' (5 Comments)
Author relishes writing the life story of ‘larger-than-life’ Oscar Goodman (3 Comments)
Elsewhere
Landowner: All roads could lead to Uxbridge casino
Revel reveals smoke-free casino opening
Cirque du Soleil show in Sands China casino to close this month
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
Nvblogger:
I don’t think that the at-large delegates take away from the other delegates awarded, so you would have to add the at-large delegates to the number of other delegates to arrive at the number you should divide by. Also, in the calculation of a turnout of 800 per site, you would then need to divide by 10, not 5. This would still result in 720 delegates, not 1,450. As a percent of total delegates awarded, either way you wind up with 6.44%.