Many of you have expressed reasonable concerns about Mrs. Clinton, but I think she edged Mr. Obama to win the debate. Whereas both of them offered specific ideas and found agreement on many issues, and while they clearly outlined their philosophical differences, Mr. Edwards, on the other hand, often seemed to return to his familiar (and tired) stumping points. He seems to speak more in generalities with trial-lawyerly appeals to emotion (no offense). For me, the choice is between Mr. Obama and Mrs. Clinton. When comparing the two, I think they both have their strengths and weaknesses. I will have to disagree with the majority of posts here as I believe Mrs. Clinton edged Mr. Obama to win this debate. Whereas Obama comes across as capable and intelligent, inspiring and eloquent, for me it still comes down to experience. I think Mrs. Clinton demonstrated her strong grasp of issues and put forth good policy ideas (which, consequently, are not too different from Obama's). As far as the criticisms levied here at Mrs. Clinton, I don't think they reflect her true persona. I've followed politics closely for many years now and I understand she's a contentious public figure, but I also know that the real Hillary Clinton is resilient, hard-working, intelligent, compassionate and capable. I know she would make an excellent President. I am not as familiar with Mr. Obama who is relatively new on the national scene. I like them both, but Mrs. Clinton will get my vote.