To Hillary 08

Hillary is a wonderful uniter...OF REPUBLICANS!!

Her experience is a myth

Hillary
-First lady of Arkansas
-First Lady
-US Senator 6 years

yeah...real experience right there.

Obama has more applicable experience and will win Nevada.

Clinton could have had a shot, but her bogus unioon lawsuit may have done her in

Hillary Clinton will be the Republicans best chance for victory in November.

She is a stone-cold, divisive woman, who will do just that. I am a registered democrat and I always have been, but Hillary Clinton will divide my party like never before. Half the members in my party are already pledged to vote against her.

Hillary is also a terrific uniter--of Republicans. She will unify and drive the Republicans to the polls lie we've never seen before. Anyone the republicans put up against Hillary will win in a landslide in November. Heck, even Ron Paul would beat Ms. Clinton.

Today's move displays a total lack of respect for the latino community. The culinary union is a powerful group made up of a large group of latinos, it gives them a voice in the workplace. Clinton's attempt to divid the union undermines this ability and is a slap in the face to the latino community.

Furthermore, if we're going to have an arguement about experience, Obama has far more applicable experience for the presidency than does Clinton. Her only experience is 8 years as a US senator. Obama was validictorian of Harvard law, president of the harvard law review, community organizer, professor of constitutional law, Illinois state senator for 8 years, US senator for 4 years. He clearly has more experience, Hillary has only been a first lady, that isn't experience.

Also Obama as a community organizer fought on the streets of Chicago for change, anyone who's lived in Chicago or lives close to Chicago knows it's a vicious town politically. But Obama succeeded there. And if he can do as well as he is against the Clinton attack machine, he will fair wonderfully against the republicans.

The issue before us is this...
Who can best win the general election for our party? The choice is clear, Barack Obama, he will build a broad coalition. He will have the democratic base, the independent vote, and will pull over even some republicans, he will win in a landslide in November if he becomes the nominee.

Finally, in US history, our greatest presidents have less federal experience and more state experience. This is the case for Barack Obama.
-Andrew Jackson never served in political office.
-Abraham Lincoln was only a US Rep. for 2 years
-Franklin Roosevelt was a NY Governor for 4 years
-Teddy Roosevelt was a Vice President for 1 year
-Harry Truman was a Vice President for 1 year
So Clinton's argument that her federal experience better qualifies her is not a historically accurate argument.

Obama is the democrats best chance for victory in November.

To all Hillary supporters...

Explain to me how Hillary is a proven leader.

This is her first stint in public office. She has never been in a position to cause political change before. She has been grandfathering in her husbands acheivements as her own. She talks about what she did in the 90's. May I remind you that running on a platform of the past is very similar to the republicans running on Ronald Reagen's platform. We need to move forward in this next election, leave the negativity behind.
Time to vote for a proven legislator, Barack Obama.

Hillary Clinton will be the Republicans best chance for victory in November.

She is a stone-cold, divisive woman, who will do just that. I am a registered democrat and I always have been, but Hillary Clinton will divide my party like never before. Half the members in my party are already pledged to vote against her.

Hillary is also a terrific uniter--of Republicans. She will unify and drive the Republicans to the polls lie we've never seen before. Anyone the republicans put up against Hillary will win in a landslide in November. Heck, even Ron Paul would beat Ms. Clinton.

Today's move displays a total lack of respect for the latino community. The culinary union is a powerful group made up of a large group of latinos, it gives them a voice in the workplace. Clinton's attempt to divid the union undermines this ability and is a slap in the face to the latino community.

Furthermore, if we're going to have an arguement about experience, Obama has far more applicable experience for the presidency than does Clinton. Her only experience is 8 years as a US senator. Obama was validictorian of Harvard law, president of the harvard law review, community organizer, professor of constitutional law, Illinois state senator for 8 years, US senator for 4 years. He clearly has more experience, Hillary has only been a first lady, that isn't experience.

Also Obama as a community organizer fought on the streets of Chicago for change, anyone who's lived in Chicago or lives close to Chicago knows it's a vicious town politically. But Obama succeeded there. And if he can do as well as he is against the Clinton attack machine, he will fair wonderfully against the republicans.

The issue before us is this...
Who can best win the general election for our party? The choice is clear, Barack Obama, he will build a broad coalition. He will have the democratic base, the independent vote, and will pull over even some republicans, he will win in a landslide in November if he becomes the nominee.

Finally, in US history, our greatest presidents have less federal experience and more state experience. This is the case for Barack Obama.
-Andrew Jackson never served in political office.
-Abraham Lincoln was only a US Rep. for 2 years
-Franklin Roosevelt was a NY Governor for 4 years
-Teddy Roosevelt was a Vice President for 1 year
-Harry Truman was a Vice President for 1 year
So Clinton's argument that her federal experience better qualifies her is not a historically accurate argument.

Obama is the democrats best chance for victory in November.

I'm telling you. She's going to unite the republicans. She's going to loose half of the democratic base. She's demonstrating that she's willing to divide anyone to win.

The issue before us is who can best beat the republicans. And the horrible truth is Clinton can not. She's too polarizing, she'll even split my party. Obama can build the coalition required to win.

Obama 08!! The only choice for the democrats.

Hillary Clinton will be the Republicans best chance for victory in November.

She is a stone-cold, divisive woman, who will do just that. I am a registered democrat and I always have been, but Hillary Clinton will divide my party like never before. Half the members in my party are already pledged to vote against her.

Hillary is also a terrific uniter--of Republicans. She will unify and drive the Republicans to the polls lie we've never seen before. Anyone the republicans put up against Hillary will win in a landslide in November. Heck, even Ron Paul would beat Ms. Clinton.

Today's move displays a total lack of respect for the latino community. The culinary union is a powerful group made up of a large group of latinos, it gives them a voice in the workplace. Clinton's attempt to divid the union undermines this ability and is a slap in the face to the latino community.

Furthermore, if we're going to have an arguement about experience, Obama has far more applicable experience for the presidency than does Clinton. Her only experience is 8 years as a US senator. Obama was validictorian of Harvard law, president of the harvard law review, community organizer, professor of constitutional law, Illinois state senator for 8 years, US senator for 4 years. He clearly has more experience, Hillary has only been a first lady, that isn't experience.

Also Obama as a community organizer fought on the streets of Chicago for change, anyone who's lived in Chicago or lives close to Chicago knows it's a vicious town politically. But Obama succeeded there. And if he can do as well as he is against the Clinton attack machine, he will fair wonderfully against the republicans.

The issue before us is this...
Who can best win the general election for our party? The choice is clear, Barack Obama, he will build a broad coalition. He will have the democratic base, the independent vote, and will pull over even some republicans, he will win in a landslide in November if he becomes the nominee.

Finally, in US history, our greatest presidents have less federal experience and more state experience. This is the case for Barack Obama.
-Andrew Jackson never served in political office.
-Abraham Lincoln was only a US Rep. for 2 years
-Franklin Roosevelt was a NY Governor for 4 years
-Teddy Roosevelt was a Vice President for 1 year
-Harry Truman was a Vice President for 1 year
So Clinton's argument that her federal experience better qualifies her is not a historically accurate argument.

Obama is the democrats best chance for victory in November.