User profile

illferris

Um, how many blatantly racist comments has Obama made against white Caucasians? Am I a "Typical white person" for saying that? Our beloved leader thinks so.

I do happen to be a fan of Palin, Paul, Bachmann, Jefferson, Adams, Mason and Madison. Furthermore, I am an intellectual (a real one who actually thinks for himself) who would be happy to absolutely run circles around you in a debate. The fact is, you have no argument to begin with, so you resort to name calling and belittling.

Speaking of which, why don't you criticize the average Obama voter who actually believed that he was going to pay for their gas, mortgage, cell phone and lifestyle? Really, who are the true idiots? The ones who work hard and are self reliant or the ones who live their entire lives with the government being their daddy? SO let's talk about who is so smart or not, mr./ms. smarty pants? Your argument doesn't even exist! Your progressive ideology got us into this mess! And I don't mean just with Obama. This goes back a century.

You want to belittle the Tea Party? How's that Hope and Change working out for you? Like $4.00 gas? I suppose the working man or the poor don't need to drive or eat...Believe it or not, we are saving America from absolute disaster, meaning bankruptcy! We are literally nearly insolvent on our debt to the foreign banks, including the private Federal Reserve. Now go ahead and get your MSNBC fix; the propaganda that it is... Real Americans don't watch TV. We read!

"There is no constitutional right for anything having to do with a car."

Actually, the Constitution was written to tell government what they DON'T have the right to do. One of them being the First Amendment, which protects the right to freedom of speech and expression from government interference. It specifically says that Congress shall make no law abridging freedom of speech. That means it says what government CANNOT do, not what citizens CAN do. It is very specific in that. Although I wouldn't expect Obama/Reid voters to know what the Constitution is intended for... Government does not have the Constitutional right to ban cars. The Constitution does not say that it has that right, therefore it does not. I can have a helicopter in my backyard if I want to. I see this as a fundamental flaw in progressive ideology. It looks to the government as the decreer by dictate for all of our "rights." Actually, our rights are almost infinite constitutionally, and only by commonwealth do we agree upon laws, mainly for our own safety. Government CANNOT simply issue a decree mandating or banning ANYTHING! Only by the will of the people in a consensus can a law be made in Congress, and only when the Constitution allows it.

You know, I would like to have LIBSSUK, NOBAMA, TEXAS T, GO GOLD or maybe USA ROX. Or perhaps GOPRULZ. Ah but GOPALIN, I wish he didn't steal my idea. These are only to irritate you libs. How fun for me! I'm willing to bet that this guy has the same motivation.

You progressives see it as moving "forward" to control what everyone else does, thinks ,feels, etc. Funny how you demand freedom of speech when you want it, but when you are offended, you cry like a bunch of whiners. Guess what? Freedom comes at a cost. You seem to prefer a dictatorship where everyone tells you what to think, feel, do, etc. You don't really want freedom. You want YOUR way. Freedom would mean that you have to put up with MY way too.