Comments by user: hanzucker
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- Dina Titus dares to cross Harry Reid, maneuvers for Democratic safe seat
- Grammy Awards struggle with honoring Whitney Houston
- Vegas gala to celebrate Muhammad Ali’s 70th birthday, benefit Ruvo Center
- Abiding by tax law is not praiseworthy
- Strip Scribbles: Is ‘Dancing With the Stars’ at Tropicana on again?
- A personal tribute and a plea: Memories of Whitney Houston
- Kate Upton, 19, is 2012 Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition cover girl
- Why compromise when you’re right?
- List of Grammy winners in select major categories
- Gorman grad finds niche, sets world records with Harlem Globetrotters
Blogs
High School Sports Scene
High School Hoops Picks: Wednesday's quarterfinals
The Kats Report
What a Whitney Houston residency in Las Vegas might have looked like
Elsewhere
Caesars' unit extends term loan maturity
The Kats Report
Color from scene at Thomas & Mack: We have a wire job! Rebels win, and Louie Armstrong sings!
South Point owner Michael Gaughan's take on 'Vegas Stripped': 'I'll give it an 8' (6 Comments)
Author relishes writing the life story of ‘larger-than-life’ Oscar Goodman (3 Comments)
Elsewhere
Landowner: All roads could lead to Uxbridge casino
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.



I know Rosenthal. Let me clue the SUN about a few things.
1. Rosenthal’s blog does not make fun of anything. It is replete with death threats, allegations of sexual misconduct, accusations of stealing public resources, defamation of character, hatred, and personal vendettas. The SUN needs to get a real dictionary if it calls Rosenthal’s blog “poking fun.” I have recorded multiple examples of every condition listed. Anyone who has read the blog has seen it.
2. Some of the hate posts and death threats have driven CSN employees to attorneys and to seek special protection for their families. That is not what happens from “poking fun.” Who knows what crazies are reading Rosenthal’s blog and would take her comments seriously and do something to harm any of Rosenthal’s victims.
3. Rosenthal’s last statement in the article that “I don’t like gossip …I wish it were not part of the blog …” is a load of crap. She not only encourages gossip, she posts it herself. Her blog is seeing fewer and fewer comments lately so she is not only posting the main threads, she goes into the comment section of her blog and adds numerous comments to bolster the damage she is trying to do to the CSN administration and agitate others to join the hate campaign. It was a hoot that she states she doesn’t have the “right” to “not publish” gossip if it is on someone’s mind. It is a fact she suppresses over a hundred comments a day (by the evidence on her blog) that are exactly someone’s comments, gossip, and submissions of fact that counter her hate comments. She sounds good until one looks at facts (see next paragraph).
4. Rosenthal’s statement that her blog gets 200 hundred hits a day is directly contradicted by her own blog. Go to the blog and you will not find 200 hits on any day since her blog started in January 2008. She lied and forgot her own blog will show she lied.
5. Rosenthal pulls down a 6-figure salary, she lives in a house, drives a nice car, has health insurance, works from home whenever she wants to, and has a very nice future. She has what about 95 plus percent of the population of the United States does not have and yet she is whining and bawling because things are not perfect in her little world.
6. “Professor” Rosenthal is probably the worst example of someone who is trying to help. Instead of meeting with CSN administrators, discussing, and offering suggestions, she posts and encourages posting from what is largely an anonymous hate blog. If she wanted to help, she would be at meetings, and asking for meetings, and suggesting. Ambushing and casting hate from an anonymous blog is not helping anyone. It is, however, consistent with her stated mission found recently on her blog of “taking down the CSN administration.” So much for “poking fun.”