Comments by user: grvande
- Most Read
- Discussed
- Most E-mailed
- Metro admits to improper release of criminal history data
- Wonder drug for men no success story
- Locomotives win inaugural UFL championship
- CityCenter: One man’s concept of a real city
- If Palin’s book is so bad, then why is it a best-seller?
- Was a foiled bank heist a cry for help?
- Bellfield tolls again for UNLV in 76-71 win over Louisville
- Metro corrections officer remembered for his love of family
- UNLV recalls last year’s close shave at Louisville
- Live game blog: Bellfield, UNLV come through late, upset No. 16 Louisville
Blogs
The Kats Report
If the message is 'rock out,' then KISS is indeed a message band (1 Comment)
Could a savior of shuttered Las Vegas Art Museum be ... Peter Max? (6 Comments)
For Paul Stanley and KISS, rock and roll is not over (6 Comments)
Twenty years ago today, Human Nature took root on the farm (1 Comment)
Robin Leach's Las Vegas Celebrity Watch
Photo Gallery: Donny Osmond’s triumphant return to the Flamingo
The Kats Report
'DWTS' champ Donny Osmond still deft afoot in return to Flamingo (8 Comments)
Politics: The Early Line
Meeting of GOP governors draws challengers, not Gibbons (5 Comments)
Calendar »
- 29 Sun
- 30 Mon
- 1 Tue
- 2 Wed
- 3 Thu
-
Tahoe Takeover at The Bank
The Bank | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
Playboy Club model search
Playboy Club | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
Queen of Queens at Revolution Lounge
Beatles Revolution Lounge | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
Zowie Bowie's Vintage Vegas Show at Monte Carlo
Lance Burton Theater
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.











You need to get your facts straight before making comments about Chrysler. In 1997, Chrysler was reported to be one of the premier auto makers in the world. Chrysler was attractive to Mercedes (Daimler) as a merger partner specifically due to the fact that it was so profitable, efficient, and had a large cash reserve. While combining Daimler and Chrysler was legally a merger, operationally, Daimler management was in control of Chrysler during the merger.
Daimler management used the Chrysler cash reserve and profits in the first years of the merger to fund the development of the Mercedes vehicle line up while systematically removing almost every Chrysler senior executive. Profits from the Chrysler financial were credited to Daimler, not Chrysler during the merger. Investment in Chrysler products was kept to a minimum and internal cross-charges were used to transfer significant amounts of cash from Chrysler to Daimler.
By the time Daimler decided to devest itself of Chrysler, the cash situation was critical and the product line was suffering due to almost ten years of Daimler mismanagement. Unfortunately, Chrysler became a stand alone company at the worst time since the Great Depression. Starting with gas prices in the US over $4 per gallon and complicated by the credit crisis. I am not sure if Chrysler "deserves help", but it is clear that these unfortunate circumstances are negatively effecting every auto manufacture in the world, on every continent. The European, Chinese, Korean, and Japanese auto manufacturers are all going to suffer this year, even Mercedes and Toyota. Many will post a loss for 2008 and many more in 2009. Helping Chrysler and the other US manufacturers is critical to the recovery of the US economy. Other countries are helping their automotive manufacturing concerns. Finally, are we so dishonest to claim that we (the US taxpayers) are not "helping" the transplants when we give huge tax abatements to Toyota, Mercedes, Honda, etc for building a plant in the USA.
Are we really certain that we want to become a country with no manufacturing base that relies on other countries for all of our production requirements?