There are plenty of gay actors, why don't they get actual gays to play the part? This is tantamount to the controversy of white actors playing Native Americans.

I hope that many of you don't ever make a mistake because, as many have stated, if you do you never deserve forgiveness or to be out of jail.

Democrats, never a tax they didn't love as long as it doesn't affect the 50% that don't pay taxes.

Ensure that illegal immigrant's children have an education that is paid by those who pay taxes, excluding the 50% that don't.

Democrats believe in good intentions but their policies take away personal responsibility and allow selective obedience to federal and state law. As a Democrat, I have started voting for the person and not the party as the party has certainly lost its way.

BTW, the road to Hell is paved with good intentions.

The question is intent. Using false statement to get a warrant is perjury and malfeasance in office, not to mention abuse of power. If found guilty then he deserves prison.

There is no misleading going on. All we have to do is see the path he is taking us on and we know that he needs to go. Yes, he has a professional staff, if he didn't that would be another strike against him, and anyone in Congress for that matter.

Anyone that has been in DC for more than 12 years needs to go so they can see what the 'normal' citizen goes through.

I also think we should have a new amendment of the Constitution stating that everyone in Congress, the Presidency, and all government workers should be under the same laws that Congress passes, no exceptions.

Actually, hss46, it was mandated by the FCC until Reagan issued orders for its demise. I remember those days but at least there were true journalists in those days. Today, most networks are left leaning as are the majority of journalists who report for them. Fox News leans right but it is the only one. Therefore, the 'fairness doctrine', if implemented, benefits the left.

And for those who say that the right had such people as Glenn Beck and O'Rielly, but I have listened to Oberman and Schultz and they do more to discredit the left than the right does.

mred, you are distrubed, aren't you? Ed Schultz is certainly not 'top rated', in fact, his numbers are pathetic. The 'fairness doctrine' will reverse the availability of both sides as stations will not air opposing view points because of the time and expense required. While I agree that with the current make up of Congress, there is a possibility of the doctrine being passed, I am certain the Supreme Court would not agree with it as it encroaches on freedom of speech.

Reid needs to go. He is the definition of a Washington politic and he does not know what the common man has to deal with these days.

What a load of BS. The Supreme Court has ruled that unless a bill specifically denies coverage it will be granted. Therefore, abortions will be covered because the bill doesn't deny it. As for illegal immigrants, Nancy Pelosi specifically stated it would be covered and, again, unless written to deny the coverage then it is covered. The Senate bill, not yet published, will deny it.
As far as Medicare, once more, the House version states it will take savings from Medicare to provide benefits to others. So, how can you take away money from Medicare and it not hurt seniors?

I don't like the Republicans but I don't trust the Democrats either as they are both alike. When you want to reform something you don't crash the whole system and start over, which is what this program will do. When you give a mouse a cracker it will ask for a glass of milk. Once you open the door then government will take it over. Socialism is just that way.

Dejanos vivir agui. Trabajomos sin papeles y manajamos sin licencia. Mandamos dinero a neustras familias para sostener un gobierno corrupto.