User profile: car_1

I do take exception with the "17 year old boy" statement. Sorry folks, he's an adult, perfectly able to make grown up decisions. Now I hope he is treated as such.

Nice mug shots. Almost exactly what I was expecting.

Harry must go, it's time to take the country back.

Thanks for the video link RebelRon.

Mr. Parker,

Exactly what constitutional rights were lost under Mr. Bush? I keep hearing the left repeat this over and over again, but upon perusing the Constitution I have yet to find any rights that I have lost. So, for the thousandth time, I have to ask: What rights were lost?

"It is interesting to note the growing demagoguery, ad nauseam, that the public is being subjected to in commentaries and editorials from conservative newsprint media attacking the Obama administration and Democrats."

So the the 1st Amendment only applies to Dems. And the public isn't being subjected to anything, simply don't read it or turn it off. I highly doubt you have truly listened or read any of it any way.

"These opinion writers only criticize, discredit and demonize those who do not subscribe to their right-wing ideology."

Simply not true. Many of the articles, interviews, and blogs I read bring up very good questions as to the benefits and detriments of many of the programs that Obama is trying to jam down the throats of the American people. Try getting some of your news from other places than DailyKos or the HuffPo. Where were your complaints of the left when we were subjected to the non-stop and and often inaccurate bloviations

"These pseudo-journalists have offered very few, if any, constructive options in dealing with the problems besetting our country, other than to "cut government and taxes for the rich.""

Again, simply false and disingenuous. There have been many plans suggested but the Obama Administration has ignored them all because they don't fit with his agenda. So, again try reading an opposing view before trashing it.

"Instead of contributing creatively to the dialogue on health care, energy, foreign policy, homeland security, comprehensive immigration reform, etc., they use their columns and editorials to ridicule other viewpoints to tacitly endorse their old and tired ultra-conservative agenda, which was tried for eight years and didn't work."

So, if one criticizes one of Obamas plans that is tantamount to ridicule. I call it a disccussion. I can successfully argue that Bush did not have an ultra-conservative agenda. In some respects he was not conservative enough. So, again, false assertion.

"This great nation of ours has again been blessed by the election of a compassionate, articulate and intellectual giant to lead us out of this morass inherited from George W. Bush and the conservative Republicans. Some of what we hear and read from the loyal opposition are tired, old and overused metaphors and sobriquets about "socialism," "Marxism," "fascism," etc."

This is the funniest paragraph of them all. "intellectual giant", seriously? Based on what? The "overused metaphors" are very accurate unless you can prove otherwise.

Thanks for the glimpse into yet more of the lefts hypocrisy.