User profile

artistsolution

I agree Shannon, what Ann fails to realize is that just because it will be "good for her" doesn't mean it will be good for the majority. She is apart of that "majority" we call citizens. Ann's self centered sentiment quickly unravels into an illogical mess when the shoe is on the other foot. For it is only then she may wake up to find that a certain law doesn't benefit her the way she thought it would. All of a sudden that same law she supported becomes a "bad law"...simply because it no longer serves HER purpose. People who are this narrow minded and short on vision, should be careful what they wish for....for their wish is sure to come true.... only to bite them in the...ask me no more questions...

Redferret wrote: Is there such a thing as unbridled capitalism in the world still?

AS: Yes, it was called the Bush administration. LOL

And you think we don't have socialism now? What do you think this 700 billion dollar bailout was? It was socialism alright, only it was some dystopian form of socialism that took from the poor to give to the rich.

Too funny, Stanley!LOL

Tok,

Bush and the republicans have been implementing the trickle down theory for 8 years now. Why isn't it working?

I agree the bailout was needed and I am glad it had some provisions for the middle class to be paid back with interest. However, banks may not be so quick to lend as you think they will. They are just glad to recoup some of their losses. 700 billion in reverse socialism (taking from the middle class to give to the rich)means nothing if it is hoarded. Let's hope that is not allowed to happen.

Most American's finances are being stretched too thin because of the increase in cost of living (which happened while bush and the republican congress where at the helm.) What happens when the middle class runs out of money, who will be left to bail out big business then? Pretty dangerous scenerio if you ask me.