Comments by user: TimP
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- Photos: Lauren Conrad celebrates her 26th birthday at Hyde Bellagio
- Dina Titus dares to cross Harry Reid, maneuvers for Democratic safe seat
- Grammy Awards struggle with honoring Whitney Houston
- Investigators seek answers to Whitney Houston’s death
- Photos: The late, great Whitney Houston is the soundtrack of my life
- Strip Scribbles: Is ‘Dancing With the Stars’ at Tropicana on again?
- Vegas gala to celebrate Muhammad Ali’s 70th birthday, benefit Ruvo Center
- List of Grammy winners in select major categories
- A personal tribute and a plea: Memories of Whitney Houston
- Abiding by tax law is not praiseworthy
Blogs
Elsewhere
Caesars' unit extends term loan maturity
The Kats Report
Color from scene at Thomas & Mack: We have a wire job! Rebels win, and Louie Armstrong sings!
South Point owner Michael Gaughan's take on 'Vegas Stripped': 'I'll give it an 8' (5 Comments)
Author relishes writing the life story of ‘larger-than-life’ Oscar Goodman (3 Comments)
Elsewhere
Landowner: All roads could lead to Uxbridge casino
Revel reveals smoke-free casino opening
Cirque du Soleil show in Sands China casino to close this month
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
While I understand Krebs thinking that this is an Ex post facto law, the US Supreme Court has already ruled that thes types of laws are NOT Ex post facto. In Smith vs Alaska the Sup. Court did so rule and added that as long as these laws do not stop an ex offender from living or working were they wanted to then the Sex Offender laws were protective in nature only and not Ex Post Facto laws. Now having said that I think that ALL SEX Offenders should pay for testing that showes how much of a danger they are to the public and then the police can watch those that are the most likely to re-offend. And those should be the only criminals on a sex offender registry.