Las Vegas Sun

Just say NO: No to the baggage, scandal, and shame that a Billary presidency would bring back to the White House.

Bet on this: if Shrillary is the nominee, there will be another Republican in the White House--her name on the ballot will galvanize GOP voters and ensure a large number of Independents and Democrats will vote GOP.

Have you seen any Republicans for Hillary groups that have formed since she announced? Didn't think so. What's the percentage of Independents that have or will vote for her, slim to zero?

Yes, Shrillary all the way--BACK TO NEW YORK, the state she calculated moving to just to run for Senate. Billary, why didn't you return back to your "home" state of Arkansas?? It's all politics baby, Shrillary has been planning this campaign for years, way before her debate answer of December 2006. Riiiiiigggghhhttttt. They can't even be truthful to themselves and they want us to believe the drivel that comes out of their mouths? Thanks but no thanks!

So Shrillary's NV folks have been aware of these caucus sites since MARCH and they still haven't figured out the rules??? Bwwaaahaaaahaaa Three of the plaintiffs--Shrillary minions--were in on the meetings and final decision back in MARCH when this deal was okayed, and HillBilly rants that they didn't understand it all??? Bwaaahaaahaa You can be sure that both Shrillary and HillBilly both had the documents about the decision but perhaps they didn't read it, kinda like Shrillary not reading the NIE report.

They all must have had a last minute cram session--"holy cow, the caucus is next week and we haven't read about the rules!"--and decided "well, even though this was agreed upon and the DNC okayed it and 3 of us were at the meeting, let's file a lawsuit!"

Shrillary says, "see it's all the Culinary Union's fault because they didn't endorse me!" In the meantime, we're going to remain *neutral* about the whole thing...HillBilly must have missed that discussion given his vein-popping rants about it.

While 58% of voters familiar with Hillary Clinton have a positive view of her, 41% give her negative marks, for a net favorability score of +17." TIME. Woo hoo, that's such an impressive score! (yes, sarcasm here...)

Chameleon Clinton hasn't been able to keep her campaign strategy on track, all they've done is flip flop depending on the day of the week.
First, "I'm the inevitable candidate"
- then "I'm your girl" awwww...
- then attack dog on her rivals
- then "I'm hyper-experienced"
- then the likeability tour (still LOL...)
- then "I'm the change agent" ???
- then "we're BFFs with Magic Johnson and we're going to Iowa!" huh???
- then "look who I'm married to in case you've forgotten" (I stayed with him so now he has to do everything I tell him!)
- then "I'm still the change agent--and Wes Clark and Madeline Albright show just how much change I offer!" ...deja vu all over again...
- then gender card/crocodile tears (the question was about how she looks so nice everyday...)
- then "we're BFFS with Bob "I promoted smut on BET" Johnson and we'll trot him out to SC to show how much we care about African-Americans"
- then "I'm eating in a taco shop so me and the Hispanic voters can be BFFs..."

Come on, HRC can't even be truthful to herself about who she really is. Yet voters are supposed to trust her...thanks but no thanks. Stay tuned for the next makeover of HRC...

While 58% of voters familiar with Hillary Clinton have a positive view of her, 41% give her negative marks, for a net favorability score of +17." TIME. Woo hoo, that's an impressive 17 favorability score!
Chameleon Clinton hasn't been able to keep her campaign strategy on track, all they've done is flip flop depending on the day of the week.
First, "I'm the inevitable candidate"
- then "I'm your girl" awwww...
- then attack dog on her rivals
- then "I'm hyper-experienced"
- then the likeability tour (still LOL...)
- then "I'm the change agent" ???
- then "we're BFFs with Magic Johnson and we're going to Iowa!" huh???
- then "look who I'm married to in case you've forgotten"
- then "I'm still the change agent--and Wes Clark and Madeline Albright show just how much change I offer!" ...deja vu all over again...
- then gender card/crocodile tears (the question was about how she looks so nice everyday...)
- then "we're BFFS with Bob "I promoted smut on BET" Johnson and we'll trot him out to SC to show how much we care about African-Americans"
- then "I'm eating in a taco shop so me and the Hispanic voters can be BFFs..."
Come on, HRC can't even be truthful to herself about who she really is. Yet voters are supposed to trust her...thanks but no thanks. Stay tuned for the next makeover of HRC...

"While 58% of voters familiar with Hillary Clinton have a positive view of her, 41% give her negative marks, for a net favorability score of +17." TIME. Woo hoo, that's an impressive 17 favorability score!

Chameleon Clinton hasn't been able to keep her campaign strategy on track, all they've done is flip flop depending on the day of the week.
First, "I'm the inevitable candidate"
- then "I'm your girl" awwww...
- then attack dog on her rivals
- then "I'm hyper-experienced"
- then the likeability tour (still LOL...)
- then "I'm the change agent" ???
- then "we're BFFs with Magic Johnson and we're going to Iowa!" huh???
- then "look who I'm married to in case you've forgotten"
- then "I'm still the change agent--and Wes Clark and Madeline Albright show just how much change I offer!" ...deja vu all over again...
- then gender card/crocodile tears (the question was about how she looks so nice everyday...)
- then "we're BFFS with Bob "I promoted smut on BET" Johnson and we'll trot him out to SC to show how much we care about African-Americans"
- then "I'm eating in a taco shop so me and the Hispanic voters can be BFFs..."

Come on, HRC can't even be truthful to herself about who she really is. Yet voters are supposed to trust her...thanks but no thanks. Stay tuned for the next makeover of HRC...

Hillary "wins big" in Michigan, 55% to 40% over UNCOMMITTED! And in one county, she eked out a "win" over UNCOMMITTED, 49% to 47%.

Folks, HRC, Kucinich, and Gravel were on the ballot and she barely gets over 50%??? Thanks but no thanks!

...the Hillary Effect could very well bounce her into the White House with a sizeable mandate...

Wow, she really secured a *huge* mandate in Michigan--what an impressive "win," 55% to 40% over UNCOMMITTED!! And in some counties, her 'mandate' was 49% to 47% over UNCOMMITTED!

You have GOT to be kidding me--HRC barely gets over 50% in this primary where it was her, Kucinich, Gravel, and UNCOMMITTED? Thanks but no thanks!

"We both have exuberant and sometimes uncontrollable supporters," Clinton said.

I heard this and did they Scooby-Doo, "HUUUHHH?" It's quite laughable that Billary said 'WE' in this sentence. Have any Obama surrogates said anything inappropriate??? Yeah, didn't think so.

On the other hand, Shrillary has had Bill "I was the first black president because I played the sax on Arsenio Hall" Clinton, Bob Kerrey, Billy Shaheen, smarmy Mark Penn, Bob "I loved playing smut on BET" Johnson, and Charles Rangel. They've ALL said something that had to go back and be "clarified" because their remarks were "misunderstood" or "taken out of context." This campaign has had to do so much backtracking, they might as well pre-empt comments and send out press releases correcting the comments before they get said! LOL

You can tell a lot about a person by the company they keep and the things "supporters" say, and well Billary, you're minions have hijacked your campaign into the gutter.

Here's standard line about the gender card:

The problem isn't that Hillary is a woman--the problem is the woman that she is. 'Nuff said.

For women to vote for HRC just because she's a woman is so utterly ridiculous. Lots of women supporting other candidates will be happy to vote for a woman--when she's the *right* woman. HRC just ain't it!

RE: Health Care, per Robert Reich, Bill's former Labor Secretary:
I'm equally concerned about her attack on his health care plan. She says his would insure fewer people than hers. I've compared the two plans in detail. Both of them are big advances over what we have now. But in my view Obama's would insure more people, not fewer, than HRC's. That's because Obama's puts more money up front and contains sufficient subsidies to insure everyone who's likely to need help -- including all children and young adults up to 25 years old. Hers requires that everyone insure themselves. Yet we know from experience with mandated auto insurance -- and we're learning from what's happening in Massachusetts where health insurance is now being mandated -- that mandates still leave out a lot of people at the lower end who can't afford to insure themselves even when they're required to do so. HRC doesn't indicate how she'd enforce her mandate, and I can't find enough money in HRC's plan to help all those who won't be able to afford to buy it. I'm also impressed by the up-front investments in information technology in O's plan, and the reinsurance mechanism for coping with the costs of catastrophic illness. HRC is far less specific on both counts. In short: They're both advances, but O's is the better of the two. HRC has no grounds for alleging that O's would leave out 15 million people.