Anjeanette who's obviously pro-Clinton, is trying to parse the truth. But the facts are there - if you say Hillary won the NV caucus, then you're saying George Bush Sr. won Bill Clinton in 1992.

It's the same rule as Iowa and NH. That's how Hillary had more delegates than EDWARDS in Iowa, even though he came 2nd and she was 3rd.

Not so fast, Zeke!

Dem turnout is high because Obama-mania. GOP turnout is low because those folks are not excited by their candidates. Just wait till Hillary becomes the nominee. Every crazy Republican will come out of the woodwork to prevent a third Clinton term, and Independents will flock to McCain.

It's been updated on Clinton News Network. Obama: 13 delegates, Clinton: 12 delegates.
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primari...

Two things must be put into perspective:

People are voting for Hillary because of Bill Clinton. He's definitely an asset to her in the Democratic, but will be a liability in the general election. In all 3 elections, she has lost the Indepedents. Nominating someone like that, against McCain who attracting many Independents is a DOA.

Clinton will have no edge against McCain. Her experience sublimes when they're put side by side. For the same reason that she has none. McCain vs Clinton will be old vs old - again, no edge for Clinton.

Obama is the reason for Huge turnout throughout this election. Don't bet a dime on it if he's not the nominee.

We, people of color (hispanics and african-Americans) are the same people who were dumb enough to elect George Bush in 2000, the same people who nominated a candidate who "voted for the war before he was against it", the same people who saved Bill Clinton's presidency during the Monica Lewinsky scandal. But Bill Clinton used us and dumped us like he used and dumped Monica Lewinsky.

The Clintons only show up when they need our votes, and then they disappear and show up again in the next election. We don't want someone like that in the white house - ever again!

Gamblndan:

You rock !!!!

That was good smackdown to ignorant SeedofEvil disguised as SeedofChange, who had nothing but hateful things to write.

A woman president is change, but not when her name is Clinton. Just give it up, SeedofEvil. Hillary WILL NEVER be president. If America wants a woman president, there are FAR BETTER choices - like Napolitano, McCaskill, Pelosi, Boxer, GENUINELY QUALIFIED public servants who worked their way up, not on the coattails of a lieing, adulterous president.

jfnikki:
Please stop posting the same comment over and over with different usernames. truth is, you're not a union member.

Virginia:
Paul Krugman is irrelevant at this moment. Someone who clearly has taken sides cannot be expected to give an unbiased and well-reasoned opinion. CNN money knows better than Krugman and they said Hillary's plan will wreck the housing market:
http://money.cnn.com/2008/01/16/commenta...

Mark Penn always seems to come out with these ignorant memos. Pride goes before a fall!

I stand with you on that, tomdc.

2008 should be a referendum against Bush-Clinton dynasty. Some people may be so naive to be happy about America being governed by the same families for 28 years, but I'm not a fan of dynastic politics and NEVER will be.

Girly_Girl:

So your pal, Shillary is ahead of Obama in a new NV poll by +9, down from 20% a month ago.

I guess that means she's the inevitable and she's going to win, right? Good for her. It will be a huge failure to her campaign if she doesn't win by 9%.

Before you believe that the Clintons diddn't have anything to do with the lawsuit, take a listen at Bill Clinton saying he did not have sexual relations with Monica Lewisnky.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KiIP_KDQm...

Or Bill Clinton saying he opposed the war in Iraq in the beginning.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IcxsxJLT2...

These people think about no one but themselves - except when they're seeking people's votes. And they will say anything to get elected. You're in a pipe dream if yoiu think Hillary can win the presidency. But let's use facts - what data from the Iowa and NH results give any clue that Hillary is electable?

Before you believe that the Clintons didn't have anything to do with the lawsuit, take a listen at Bill Clinton saying he did not have sexual relations with Monica Lewisnky.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KiIP_KDQm...

Or Bill Clinton saying he opposed the war in Iraq in the beginning.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IcxsxJLT2...

These people think about no one but themselves - except when they're seeking people's votes. And they will say anything to get elected. You're in a pipe dream if yoiu think Hillary can win the presidency. But let's use facts - what data from the Iowa and NH results give any clue that Hillary is electable?