Las Vegas Sun

February 13, 2012

Currently: 50° | Complete forecast | Log in

User profile
Si_Se_Puede

Joined
Jan. 12, 2008

Contact Si_Se_Puede (log-in required)

Recent Comments

Total Comments: 31 (view all)

Anjeanette who's obviously pro-Clinton, is trying to parse the truth. But the facts are there - if you say Hillary won the NV caucus, then you're saying George Bush Sr. won Bill Clinton in 1992.

It's the same rule as Iowa and NH. That's how Hillary had more delegates than EDWARDS in Iowa, even though he came 2nd and she was 3rd.

Not so fast, Zeke!

Dem turnout is high because Obama-mania. GOP turnout is low because those folks are not excited by their candidates. Just wait till Hillary becomes the nominee. Every crazy Republican will come out of the woodwork to prevent a third Clinton term, and Independents will flock to McCain.

It's been updated on Clinton News Network. Obama: 13 delegates, Clinton: 12 delegates.
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primari...

(Suggest removal) 1/20/08 at 5:19 a.m.

Two things must be put into perspective:

People are voting for Hillary because of Bill Clinton. He's definitely an asset to her in the Democratic, but will be a liability in the general election. In all 3 elections, she has lost the Indepedents. Nominating someone like that, against McCain who attracting many Independents is a DOA.

Clinton will have no edge against McCain. Her experience sublimes when they're put side by side. For the same reason that she has none. McCain vs Clinton will be old vs old - again, no edge for Clinton.

Obama is the reason for Huge turnout throughout this election. Don't bet a dime on it if he's not the nominee.

(Suggest removal) 1/20/08 at 4:49 a.m.

We, people of color (hispanics and african-Americans) are the same people who were dumb enough to elect George Bush in 2000, the same people who nominated a candidate who "voted for the war before he was against it", the same people who saved Bill Clinton's presidency during the Monica Lewinsky scandal. But Bill Clinton used us and dumped us like he used and dumped Monica Lewinsky.

The Clintons only show up when they need our votes, and then they disappear and show up again in the next election. We don't want someone like that in the white house - ever again!

(Suggest removal) 1/19/08 at 5:47 a.m.

Gamblndan:

You rock !!!!

That was good smackdown to ignorant SeedofEvil disguised as SeedofChange, who had nothing but hateful things to write.

A woman president is change, but not when her name is Clinton. Just give it up, SeedofEvil. Hillary WILL NEVER be president. If America wants a woman president, there are FAR BETTER choices - like Napolitano, McCaskill, Pelosi, Boxer, GENUINELY QUALIFIED public servants who worked their way up, not on the coattails of a lieing, adulterous president.

(Suggest removal) 1/19/08 at 5:33 a.m.

jfnikki:
Please stop posting the same comment over and over with different usernames. truth is, you're not a union member.

Virginia:
Paul Krugman is irrelevant at this moment. Someone who clearly has taken sides cannot be expected to give an unbiased and well-reasoned opinion. CNN money knows better than Krugman and they said Hillary's plan will wreck the housing market:
http://money.cnn.com/2008/01/16/commenta...

(Suggest removal) 1/18/08 at 5:51 p.m.

(view all 31)

Items submitted by Si_Se_Puede

  • Photos
  • Videos
  • Stories/Blogs

Si_Se_Puede has not submitted any photos to Las Vegas Sun

Si_Se_Puede has not submitted any videos to Las Vegas Sun

Si_Se_Puede has not submitted any stories to Las Vegas Sun

Most Popular

  • Viewed
  • Discussed
  • E-mailed
  • Facebook