- User profile
- Narcissa
- Joined
- April 6, 2008
Contact Narcissa (log-in required)
Recent Comments
Total Comments: 149 (view all)
Boftx; Even I wouldn't even bother to read to the bottom of my post-way too lengthy-but also way too much fun to compose.
As much as I hate to jump on the public school (post 1953!) bashing bandwagon, it is hilarious to observe-at least based on the indignant responses-a readership that certainly didn't get the benefit of critical thinking analysis attendant to a Westchester public school education. (Needless to say, I wouldn't dare broach the laughable possibility of any posters having had an east coast private school experience-unless Dad had to donate the new roof-because let's face it, a sadder grasp of irony has probably never been exhibited in the history of human readership as on this thread.)
Here's a thought, though! Try reading the posts from readers of the London Times or even The Guardian (for you lefties). Even the most uneducated poster from that Tory (look it up) rag, the Daily Mail, can comprehend irony and communicate same in ways that-well, never mind.
Anyway, it was fun, but off to bed! Morning meeting with the Queen Bee tomorrow, and plus-without sounding arrogant (I'm grateful for what my hard work, education, and dedication has brought me), someone's gotta be footing the bill when the AZ law gets shot down by the Ninth Circus!
Really, BestBet?! You mean the creator of 'The Family Guy', Seth Myers on SNL, a variety of college dropouts/drug addicts that make a living singing songs and/or regurgitating words that other people write for them onto the silver screen, not to mention virtually every pundit featured on the MSM, is WRONG about the AZ law?!
Are you telling me-with a straight face, mind you-that a law that allows law enforcement to not only REQUEST legitimate documentation from a person after a lawful stop, but then allows that same law enforcement officer to arrest that person on a "reasonable, articulable suspicion" of being an illegal, is NOT akin to life in Nazi Germany?
I'm shocked, just shocked-if only because that would mean that domestic policy experts like
Michael Moore and Gloria Estefan are WRONG when they claim that the Arizona law is akin to
Nazism! I suppose the fact that under the AZ law, the worst that would happen is a one way ticket
back to Mexico, whereas, in Nazi Germany, not having proper docs meant a one way ticket to
Dachau, but why quibble over facts, especially when no-one ine the media bothers to point out that minor discrepancy?
So, I will continue to reiterate my outrage over the cruel, cruel AZ law. Imagine, being able to catch
an illegal as a result of a lawful stop. Now that's a Nazi state if I ever saw one, and, as long as the
always objective Sun, Hollywood celebs, the MSM, and all those highly articulate protestors
demanding "their rights" (because remember-no person is "illegal"!!), I will maintain my argument
that this outrageous law can only undermine the notion of our Founding Fathers that the United
States is nothing more than an international flophouse.
And, really, however did we manage for the past two hundred years or so, without these hard working Mexican illegals? What with all the technological advances their country has provided over the centuries, it's a miracle we in the U.S managed to survive as long as we did without them! Just look at how east Las Vegas has flourished into an elegant, crime-free "Summerlin East", with all the attendant educational and cultural standards if you don't believe me!
So, down with the racial profiling law that will enable Nazi-style thuggery that
sends illegals homes! It's cruel to enforce a law-and, as Obama says, people will get hassled by the Nazis if they try to go out for ice cream with their kid!
If this were NOT true, the always objective Sun would have pointed out his statement, along with many others, as a blatant lie. But they did not, and since The Sun would NEVER have an amnesty agenda, I will always believe what they and the aforementioned other anti "anti-immigrant" fighters tell me. Cause if they say so, it must be true!
(This is just getting to be too fun, and I'm almost late for a date, so remember, people-down with the Nazi AZ law, and Se Si Puede!!!!)
Excuse me, "Get a Life", but I am only parrottingbwhat that constitutional law expert, Linda Rondstat, said about a law that allows a law enforcement officer to ask about a person's immigration status if they are unable to provide legitimate proof of identification after a lawful stop.
And what about all those protestors in San Fransisco that said the law is JUST LIKE Nazi Germany? No one in the media has contravened their claim (and, I won't even mention challenging the critical thinking of the "Boycott Arizona" Hollywood celebrities, since, well, they ARE celebrities and challenging someone who gets paid to memorize and repeat words that others write would be just plain disrepectful, for obvious reasons!!)
Finally, Barracka Hussein Obama TOLD us that from now on, a person in Arizona might not be able to take his child for ice cream, for fear of "the Nazis" hassling him while he decides between one or two scoops.
I actuall thought "Dad" would first have to get popped for actuall trying to ROB the store before the Nazi "hassles" him, but since Obama explained the law so accurately, I can see I was clearly mistaken. It IS Obama doin the talkin', after all!
So, while it's unfortunate that my outrage over this cruel law offends you, I am simply repeating the facts as has been portrayed by the MSM, highly-educated Hollywood celebrities, even more highly-educated illegal aliens, and highly employable San Fransisco hippies and anarchists. And, of course, the always reliable Obama.
So sad that you fail to empathize and feel outrage over the Nazi takeover. :0(
This has to be one of the most outrageous examples of racial profiling I have ever come across and it is a perfect example of why that scary Arizona law must be repealed immediately!!!
This is because the fact pattern here mirrors precisely what is written in the AZ law. A law enforcement officer notices a vehicle violating the speed limit and then he has the nerve to pull over the driver. As if that's not bad enough, he then demands identification from the driver.
In Arizona, this driver's failure to provide a driver's license that is statutorily accepted as proof of citizenship or lawful residency would subsequently leave him vulnerable to ADDED questions about his legal status. (And, yes, I realize that federal law requires all lawfully present aliens to carry their green card on their person AT ALL TIMES, but really, I think that's a bit onerous of a request, don't
you?)
Sooo, anyway, if this driver had been pulled over in Arizona for speeding, and he didn't have a valid
driver's license and was unable to provide the officer with proof of identification that he might be
legally required to carry at all times, this poor man would then be questioned about his immigration status, you know, just so the officer could find out just who the Hell this man speeding through the desert in the middle of the night is.
This, people, is what would happen under the new Arizona law. I personally think the officer should just have to say, "Oh, you have no driver's license and/or any other form of identification? Well, you have a nice day, Sir, and sorry for the inconvenience."
Instead, we can see the sort of civil liberties outrages that the Arizona law would allow these Jack-booted thug officers to do to this OBVIOUSLY racially-profiled gentleman.
Just like Nazi Germany, clearly.
OUTRAGEOUS!!!
Items submitted by Narcissa
- Photos
- Videos
- Stories/Blogs
Narcissa has not submitted any photos to Las Vegas Sun
Narcissa has not submitted any videos to Las Vegas Sun
Narcissa has not submitted any stories to Las Vegas Sun
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- Motorcycle accident claims life of man in northeast valley
- Investigators seek answers to Whitney Houston’s death
- Photos: The late, great Whitney Houston is the soundtrack of my life
- Photos: Lauren Conrad celebrates her 26th birthday at Hyde Bellagio
- Grammy Awards struggle with honoring Whitney Houston
- Pre-Grammy gala celebrates Whitney Houston’s life
- Man charged in plot to kill Utah governor
- List of Grammy winners in select major categories
- RI player wins $336 million Powerball jackpot
- Strip Scribbles: Is ‘Dancing With the Stars’ at Tropicana on again?
Blogs
The Kats Report
Color from scene at Thomas & Mack: We have a wire job! Rebels win, and Louie Armstrong sings!
South Point owner Michael Gaughan's take on 'Vegas Stripped': 'I'll give it an 8' (5 Comments)
Author relishes writing the life story of ‘larger-than-life’ Oscar Goodman (3 Comments)
Elsewhere
Landowner: All roads could lead to Uxbridge casino
Revel reveals smoke-free casino opening
Cirque du Soleil show in Sands China casino to close this month
Meet the woman behind Sheldon Adelson
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.



Oh, please, you're all missing the point. Do you really think Steve Wynn cares what you think of him and what you're misinterpreting as some morality decision?
This is a lability issue-most likely Waits was on duty, working as an employee-either directly or indirectly-with Wynn Properties. If any employee is running around and/or driving wasted while on duty, of course Wynn has to can him!
Can you imagine the liability problems if in the future, this clown Waits was involved in DUI with bodily harm? Every ambulance chaser in town would name the business as a defendant and the fact that Wynn Properties could be shown to employ someone they knew had prior on the job issues won't be a big help in trying to deny liability!
Quit flattering yourselves-notwithstanding he general bad pr, which is fleeting, anyway-this has nothing to do with what Steve Wynn wants you to think of him; it's all about the money.