- Most Read
- Discussed
- Editors’ Picks
- UPDATED with audio: American Idols Live: Archuleta wins the night
- Idol worship, sans America
- Rising use of painkillers taking deadly toll
- Mayor says Vegas hurt more than other cities by gas prices
- Lakefront homes, while lake lasts
- Two California teenagers die in accident on Colorado River
- An astonishing revelation
- Survey: Gas prices deter Southern Californians
- UPDATE: Driver arrested in bus stop crash that kills one, injures another
- Measures linked, going nowhere
Blogs
Sports: Upon Further Review
TNF: Kelley wins; Tyson didn't see it
Now and Then
Sun Ming Ming, 7-foot-9 center, selected in Globetrotters "draft"
Sports: Upon Further Review
TNF: The UFC guy loses; Tyson is not impressed
TNF: My goodness Kaspars is big
TNF: Mike Tyson is in the house
Tuesday Night Fights at the Hilton: Elvis has left the building but Kaspars (Kambala) isn't a ghost
Vegas News
Vegas woman selected as White House fellow
Politics: The Early Line
Ensign offers way to pay for energy tax credits, but it may be too late
Calendar
- Impurities (9 p.m.)
- Jerry Tiffe (2 p.m. to 4 p.m.)
- Louie Anderson (7 p.m.)
- The Improv at Harrah's (8:30 p.m.)
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.


I feel that we Las Vegas is being fed propaganda regarding actual water usage and the causes of the Lake's declining water levels. The article tries to tie the growth of Las Vegas with the Lakes decline. This is incorrect, and Las Vegas water usage shows that the City is actually much more efficient in water usage compared to ten or twenty years ago despite our rapidly growing city. So this attempt to tie our rapid growth and the Lakes water level is false. Secondly, although Las Vegas does rely on 90% of its water supply from the Lake, the majority of the water is sent downstream to other states such as Arizona and California for Agricultural uses. So in reality, Las Vegas probably uses less than 10% of the Colorado's flow.
The Lake is continuing to decline because it is a man made lake, that is tied to a massive hydro powerplant. Again, the majority of this power is sent elsewhere for their power needs. Our nations power consumption has grown, so the hydro plant must continue to be fed massive flows of water despite it using more water and is actually replenishing the dam. So in reality, if Las Vegas and its more efficient water usage was taken into consideration, the Lake might have kept its current levels if we didn't have to keep the gates open to run the power plants.
The normal twenty and thrity year weather patterns are probably the second significant cause for the Lakes decline. If you examine past Lake levels, one can clearly see that Lake levels have receded and expanded due to snow fall in the mountains when Las Vegas was still a very small town, and the other major cities like Phoenix were still minor as well. Any kid that grew up close to a river or creek can tell you that sometimes, creeks just dry up sometimes when there isn't enough snow melt or rain.
So please, quit trying to feed this line that our cities growth has contributed to the lakes decline. The reality is this, Lake levels fall and rise depending on weather patterns that have been established on this continent for thousands of years. Should the govt have planned better and anticipated diminishing snow melt in the mountains, and planned to cut back on power generated by the dam and restrict water usage downstream by the farmers?, probably yes but this would have required real discussion and agreement with politicians across state lines. This would have never happened. Instead, we have to read articles like this trying to spell doom and gloom of Las Vegas. Only when you stop talking about left leaning hype that only is meant to promote some GREEN initiative can you really address falling lake levels if that is really what really want to do as a collective society. I support conservation, but not at the cost of reality and the truth.