armymom - I'm glad you are supporting Hillary. But your comments about Obama being Muslim are waaaay offbase and uninformed. It's not your fault. A lot of people are falling for these slanderous internet spams. But before you start blindly regurgitating internet lies about Obama's "Muslim" background, I suggest you check snopes.com for the real story.

So Katy, mickleca, jade, Johnny, unionGRL, who did you vote for in the 2000 general election? Gore, Bush or Nader?

Clinton, Obama and Edwards would all be great presidents - vastly better than anybody running for the GOP nomination.

If John doesn't get the nod, I'm hoping Hillary or Barak will make him Attorney General.

"Poor likability"? Katy, a lot of morons thought W was more "likable" than Vice-President Gore, that Dumbya was a "guy they could drink a beer with". Look where that got us. W = worst president ever. Give me intelligence and a first-hand understanding of the office any day of the week.

So if Hil gets the nod, Katy, who will you vote for? Rudy? Mit?

My question to supporters of all the Democratic candidates for President is, will you support our party's nominee regardless of whether it is Obama, Clinton or Edwards?

Clinton-Obama works for me. It would be an awesome ticket.

This demonization of the various Democratic presidential candidates by their rivals' supporters is more than a bit ridiculous. I've been working on Democratic presidential campaigns since 1972, and our bench this year is easily the best I've seen. While I am backing Senator Clinton, mostly because she is the one best prepared of the Democratic contendors to be president from day 1 (their actual ideological and policy differences are miniscule), I will happily support whoever we as Democrats nominate for president. And I hope my fellow Democrats will drop the lame vitriol and rhetoric, show some maturity, and do the same.

Oh, and don't buy the stupid comments about Obama's "Muslim" background. That's just ignorance. A visit to Snopes.com will clear that up in a jiffy.