Comments by user: DBCG
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- Photos: Lauren Conrad celebrates her 26th birthday at Hyde Bellagio
- Dina Titus dares to cross Harry Reid, maneuvers for Democratic safe seat
- Grammy Awards struggle with honoring Whitney Houston
- Investigators seek answers to Whitney Houston’s death
- Photos: The late, great Whitney Houston is the soundtrack of my life
- Vegas gala to celebrate Muhammad Ali’s 70th birthday, benefit Ruvo Center
- Strip Scribbles: Is ‘Dancing With the Stars’ at Tropicana on again?
- List of Grammy winners in select major categories
- A personal tribute and a plea: Memories of Whitney Houston
- Abiding by tax law is not praiseworthy
Blogs
Elsewhere
Caesars' unit extends term loan maturity
The Kats Report
Color from scene at Thomas & Mack: We have a wire job! Rebels win, and Louie Armstrong sings!
South Point owner Michael Gaughan's take on 'Vegas Stripped': 'I'll give it an 8' (5 Comments)
Author relishes writing the life story of ‘larger-than-life’ Oscar Goodman (3 Comments)
Elsewhere
Landowner: All roads could lead to Uxbridge casino
Revel reveals smoke-free casino opening
Cirque du Soleil show in Sands China casino to close this month
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
Another good idea that has gone way too far!
Why not send one fire department unit, without lights & sirens blaring, to check the alarm out. If the homeowner is away, and can't call the FD, any fire will be much worse by the time the FD gets the call (if they do).
I don't see the rescue issue as a problem, an automatic alarm will alert any occupants. But, again; if the home is empty, it will burn to the ground before the FD gets notified.
What is the FD doing that is so important not to be bothered by sending a single unit to check the alarms out? Reduced response is a great idea, this policy has gone too far.