Darryl,
Don't be silly. Clinton is not even CLOSE to being as electable as Obama -
http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?I...

This is from October, of course, but I imagine that 50% has gone nowhere but UP. It certainly couldn't have gone down.

Either Democrats like her or they don't. They don't "sort of" like her. Republicans would NEVER vote for her.

I'm one (of I suspect MANY) democrats would would NEVER vote for Hillary Clinton.

Clinton:
Polarizing. Manipulative. Slimy.
BAD for our country.

Darryl -
Are you honestly still clinging on to the "Clinton has more experience than Obama" fallacy?

Girly_Girl,
You are delusional.
You simply CAN'T caucus at more than one location in Iowa - you can't just walk in, vote, then leave. You have to stay until it is OVER - and you surely can't just waltz in to another precinct. They close the doors - and once they do, nobody can get in.
By the way, I suggest you read the update to this article.

Taelyn, you are equally delusional. Was it the Obama campaign that wanted to set up these at large precincts? No. It was the state Democratic party. Obama did NOT defraud ANYONE.

The only thing the American public is going to take from all this is the fact that the Hillary people didn't start whining until AFTER they didn't get the culinary endorsement.
It won't be that big of a deal, though. Nobody is surprised. Everyone will brush it off as "typical Clinton politics."

You are the one in need of the "reality check." Only until very recently Clinton described herself "agnostic" about Yucca Mountain.
Obama, on the other hand, has been very outspoken on the issue - calling on Reid and Boxer to abandon the project.
"The selection of Yucca Mountain has failed, the time for debate on this site is over, and it is time to start exploring new alternatives for safe, long-term solutions based on sound science."
-Barack Obama, October 30, 2007

Clinton is manipulative and untruthful. She is most certainly not the "best-prepared, best-qualified Democratic candidate."

You are doing a huge disservice to your readers by publishing this nonsense.