Reader Poll
Should adults be able to ride a motorcycle in Nevada without a helmet?
| Response | Votes | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | 71% | 419 | |
| No. | 28% | 170 | |
| Total Votes | 589 | ||
Note: This is not a scientific poll. The results reflect only the opinions of those who chose to participate.
Discussion: 7 comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. See all Comments »
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- Photos: Olivia Culpo, 20, of Rhode Island is crowned 2012 Miss USA at Planet Hollywood
- US Navy hopes stealth ship answers a rising China
- Photos: Derek Hough celebrates 27th birthday at Tabu Ultra Lounge
- Learning about Electric Daisy Carnival fans will help Las Vegas court them
- On the horizon: A quick look at projects poised to shape downtown







Actually it's a Good idea, to have people ride without helmets, we call that "Natural Selection"
Jonathan
They should be allowed to ride without a helmet provided they pre-pay the neurosugeon.
Anybody that would want to ride a bike without a helmet needs their head examined anyway!
Maybe that is an approach to reducing water consumption. Maybe they should require a 100,000 dollar deposit when you buy a motorcycle to pay for part of your care when you scramble your brains. If you don't need it, they could put a check in your coffin or among your ashes.
Sure they should. As long as they have one million in personal injury/care insurance along with it. Someone mentioned $100k, which wouldn't come close to covering brain damage.
Freedom of choice.
Freedom of choice is lovely until I have to pay for the police and fire departments to go out and collect unhelmeted motorcyclists with a stick and a spoon. The only people who want motorcycle riders to be able to go without a helmet played football without a helmet.
Only if the second part of the bill has a rider that states that only the responsible parties are financially on the hook for expenses if a rider is sans helmet.