Las Vegas Sun

December 20, 2014

Currently: 42° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Political heat derails plan to let Legislature meet in Las Vegas

Image

Sam Morris

The lobby of the Nevada State Legislature building is seen during the second day of the legislative special session Wednesday, February 24, 2010 in Carson City.

Tick Segerblom

Tick Segerblom

CARSON CITY — A proposal to allow the Nevada Legislature to meet in Las Vegas is being scrapped.

Sen. Tick Segerblom, D-Las Vegas, said Friday he is proposing an amendment to strip from his resolution a proposal to allow sessions of the Legislature in Southern Nevada or elsewhere in the state outside of Carson City.

“Everyone complained that we were moving the capital to Las Vegas, and I couldn’t take the heat,” he said.

The state Constitution says the business of the Legislature must be conducted at the seat of government, which is Carson City.

The resolution would have permitted the Legislature to meet anywhere in the state and was aimed at having some sessions or committee meetings in Las Vegas.

Segerblom noted that committees can meet in Las Vegas and take symbolic votes, but those votes must be ratified in Carson City.

The resolution still contains a proposal to permit the Legislature to meet every year instead of every other year. The Legislature is now limited to a 120-day session in odd-numbered years, and lawmakers are only paid for the first 60 days.

The resolution proposes 90-day regular sessions in odd-numbered years and paying lawmakers for every day. In even-numbered years, the session would be limited to 30 days with full pay.

The resolution would have to be approved this session and again in the 2015 Legislature and then ratified by voters.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 2 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. "The resolution still contains a proposal to permit the Legislature to meet every year instead of every other year. The Legislature is now limited to a 120-day session in odd-numbered years, and lawmakers are only paid for the first 60 days".

    Better results could be obtained from "our legislators" if they showed up in Carson City and worked 60 days as they are now paid to do. Forget about extending the time it should be decreased to 60 days...To save the people of the great state of Nevada any Mo harebrained self-serving grandiose bills that continue to fuel our descent into economic slavery for the benefit of few, at the expense of many....

  2. Pardon me for gloating but I loved the article in the R/J detailing how unions are whining and crying over the Obama "Affordable Health Care Act" and its negative consequences for them. It's both fitting and ironic that the unions are pilloring the guy with the Cheshire Cat grin for lying to them. They deserve what they brought upon themselves and the nation as a whole. They back crazies such as Nancy Pelosi, the one who so famously stated: "We have to pass the bill in order to see what's in it." Well, union sycophants, now we know and it's about to bite your members in the behind. Good. Maybe they'll now work to rein in your leftist tendencies.