Las Vegas Sun

October 1, 2014

Currently: 71° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

J. Patrick Coolican:

Nevada Medical Board, just whom do you serve?

J. Patrick Coolican

J. Patrick Coolican

Earlier this year, I wrote about Dr. Sean Steele, an internist who was accused of a brutal sexual assault after a night of drinking in Las Vegas.

Steele pleaded no contest to misdemeanor battery.

Steele was licensed in both California and Nevada. The Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners took a “nonpublic action,” a sanction so negligible that it isn’t even revealed to the public.

The Nevada board reasoned that because Steele wasn’t convicted of the the original felony sexual assault charges, there was no reason to take more serious action.

Also, board President Dr. Benjamin Rodriguez told me it was a “he said, she said” situation that had no nexus to the practice of medicine.

The California Medical Board, on the other hand, did its own investigation and concluded that Steele had “brutally sexually attacked” the woman and then lied about it under oath. The board called his behavior “unbecoming to a member in good standing of the medical profession, and which demonstrates an unfitness to practice medicine.”

Here’s a summary — warning, it’s quite graphic — of what Steele did to the woman, according to the California Medical Board: The Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner testified that a pelvic exam was painful for the woman because she had suffered a 1- to 1 1/2-inch laceration to the clitoral hood. In fact, the victim had a clitoral piercing that had been “torn through the skin.” An ornamental silver ball attached to the piercing was missing. The nurse said the resulting “ragged lacerations” were the largest she had seen in roughly 4,000 cases. The ornamental silver ball was later found in Steele’s car by Metro Police.

California revoked his license.

When I raised the discrepancy with the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners — California revokes license, Nevada does virtually nothing — Douglas Cooper, the executive director, and Rodriguez all but defended Steele and questioned the California decision.

Maybe they were so sympathetic to the doctor because they never interviewed the victim.

Steele appealed the California Medical Board ruling to the state’s Superior Court, asserting, among other claims, that he was denied due process rights because his attorney was absent the day the victim testified and so was unable to cross-examine her.

Judge Timothy Frawley denied the appeal last week. As the court notes, Steele’s attorney never even asked for a continuance. He called just 30 minutes before the hearing was to begin on the day the victim had traveled all the way from Nevada to San Diego to testify. The court noted these rather sketchy circumstances.

Having dealt with this attorney, Russell Iungerich, who missed several phone interviews with me under strange circumstances over the course of weeks, I understand the court’s skepticism.

(Iungerich didn’t reply to an email I sent him Friday.)

Steele also argued in his appeal that his behavior that night isn’t related to his duties as a physician.

Here’s the court’s response: “Petitioner's claim that there is no substantial relationship between a battery conviction and the qualifications, functions, or duties of a physician borders on the absurd and merits little discussion. A conviction for the willful and unlawful use of force or violence upon another is undeniably related to the qualifications, functions, or duties of a physician, particularly where, as here, the battery involved an aggravated sexual assault committed against a vulnerable person trapped in the back seat of her attacker's car.”

Previously, Cooper told me Nevada could still act but that they were awaiting results of the California appeal. But he expressed confidence Steele would prevail.

So, I called him Friday to ask if Nevada would now take action against Steele.

You guessed it: Nope.

Steele’s legal defeat in California — devastating to him in my mind — “is not cause for us to take additional action,” Cooper said. “It’s going to be appealed to the (California) Supreme Court.” He said Team Steele told him they would appeal.

Nevada will take no action until all of Steele’s appeals are exhausted, Cooper said.

Where does it end? I asked him. The U.S. Supreme Court? Will it take Nino Scalia to shush away Steele before Nevada will act?

Cooper put on his legal analyst hat and told me he doesn’t think it will go that far, saying he’s once again confident Steele will win his appeal at the California Supreme Court. “I think he has a good case,” he said.

Well, isn’t that great.

The question for the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners is this: Do you work for Nevadans or do you work for Dr. Sean Steele, who can only practice in Nevada because we apparently have such low standards of professional conduct?

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 3 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. "The question for the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners is this: Do you work for Nevadans or do you work for Dr. Sean Steele..."

    Coolican -- another good one from you. These docs circled the wagons and protected one of their own, to the detriment of Nevada. Now, how about taking on the Bar, especially judges?!

    "This is a non story."

    NVFisherman -- what an ignorant post.

    "This medical board needs some oversight."

    Wolfdog -- especially from We the people. And what are they doing about this?? Nothing, as usual.

    "I think you all know that I've always felt the nine most terrifying words in the English language are 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help.'" -- the late President Ronald Reagan on YouTube @ http://youtu.be/xhYJS80MgYA

  2. It's quite clear that the Medical Board and the Psychiatric care are synchronized in the support mode.

  3. Good article Mr Coolican. Why should Nevadans pay for government welfare workers under the guise of helping protect Nevadans when they do NOT?

    NV Mine Safety and Training Section protects Corporate Miners NOT workers.

    NV State Board of Equalization protects NV State taxes NOT property owners.

    NV Div. of Environmental Protection/NV Environmental Commission...protects Corporate polluter's NOT Nevadans and their children.

    http://nv.diversifynevada.com/about/ >
    Nevada Governor's Office of Economic Development...
    "Through collaboration and strategic alliances Nevada will become the national model". Sounds like Nazis Germany... Where NV government will employ more welfare workers to harass you and any type of business...you will need their permissions BEFORE any new business starts on what used to be YOUR property. along w/fees and license's.

    Welcome to what passes for representative government in Nevada that represents governments best interests contrary to NV Constitution Article 1. Sections 1 and 2. Government is instituted for the protection, security and benefit of the people;

    Nowhere in NV Constitution is the phrase "Through collaboration and strategic alliances Nevada will become the national model".

    Paul Rupp, using PO Box 125 SP NV 89047