Las Vegas Sun

October 24, 2014

Currently: 64° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Budgets:

State agencies still trying to determine effects of federal cuts

Federal government programs in Nevada are about to take a hit, but nobody seems to know just how much the blow will hurt.

Congress let a 5 percent cut go into effect this year, meaning federal programs in Nevada will see a negative impact of about $60 million a year if those cuts continue because of federal inaction, said state budget director Jeff Mohlenkamp.

But Mohlenkamp also said state agencies are still trying to figure out where the hammer will come down the hardest and whether some of the cuts will materialize.

“At the end of the day, I'm going to be honest with you, when I give you the numbers, they're wrong,” he told a legislative committee Saturday.

Legislators meeting in Carson City need to know about the federal cuts so that they can plan to backfill losses with state dollars if they deem it necessary. Nevada’s legislative session ends June 3, so they don’t have much time to act.

Mohlenkamp said most state budget directors he’s talked to say states are taking a wait-and-see approach to determine what the federal government may do with its next budget, which begins Oct. 1.

“The states are quite honestly simply not really engaged in any meaningful backfill of these federal dollars,” he said.

Instead, he recommended that the Legislature take precautions and dump some extra money in the state’s “rainy-day fund,” which is akin to Nevada’s savings account for unexpected expenses.

A panel of official state economic forecasters granted the state an extra $37 million last week because the economy is slowly improving. Mohlenkamp said the Legislature could reserve some of that money for the rainy-day fund.

Gov. Brian Sandoval earlier tried to assure Nevadans that his administration is managing the federal budget cuts, and Mohlenkamp’s brief to legislators represents the latest public statement in the management plan.

Although the budget cuts originate with Congress at the federal level, Nevada plans to get about $6 billion in federal dollars during the next two years.

Many other federal government agencies operate in Nevada and will be subject to budget cuts, which result from the failure of Congress and the White House to avert self-imposed cuts designed to be so draconian that the Republican Congress and Democratic White House would be forced to strike a budget deal.

Their failure left state governors to manage the budget cuts in their respective states.

“Unlike elected officials in Washington, we must take swift action to mitigate the extensive consequences,” Sandoval said in a statement in February. “My administration started planning for sequestration last summer, knowing we may need a contingency plan should it go into effect. While we have worked to set money aside and have a plan to move forward, there are still some areas of the budget which will be affected.”

The most obvious effects of the federal belt tightening have been seen at airports, where travelers experienced delays related to the cuts. Congress voted to end those airport delays by paying air traffic controllers to stay on the job.

“When it came to the air traffic controllers, I was kind of surprised that it came as a surprise,” said Sen. Debbie Smith, D-Sparks, who noted that making government service providers take days off would result in slowdowns in services.

Mohlenkamp said the largest meaningful reductions in federal funding are in programs that generally serve low-income Nevadans.

The cuts may affect the state’s ability to deliver its Women, Infants and Children services, increase wait lists for child care services, and reduce the state’s ability to help low-income Nevadans pay energy costs.

Schoolchildren in low-income families may also see reductions in services, although Mohlenkamp noted the state is increasing English-language learner and all-day kindergarten programs in low-income schools that could offset the federal cuts.

Legislators concluded that it would be wise to put money in the bank to make sure they’re able to pay for programs should federal cuts continue.

“We do need to figure out a way to put some money aside in a contingency fund,” said Assemblywoman Maggie Carlton, D-Las Vegas, who chairs the Assembly’s Ways and Means committee.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 1 comment so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. First of all, we all need to live our lives in a way that does not put us in a dependent position with the government. But programs to assist weakened individuals towards that end, have suffered cuts or total elimination of/in such programs. Penny wise, pound foolish. "An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure" seems to fall upon deaf ears in government.

    Overpopulation, unchecked/unregulated immigration, unplanned families, all have an impact on governmental services and future funding. We cannot continue to ignore those who are in need, those who are the weak and vulnerable in our country, state, and community.

    We are only as strong as our weakest link.

    The financial storms continue to blow, where government favors the rich, strong, prospering elite and their crony corporations, and Lawmakers will continue to cut services and support, neglecting those without the means, being cripled each year with lower pay and benefits, to pay---be it their next meal or a governmental lobbyist to represent them.

    Because of such policy and behavior, and the fact corporations pay a pittance in taxes, government will run its true resource for revenue, its everyday, little guy Citizen, into poverty, want, and destitution, with government following right behind them until there is a corporate takeover of this great country.

    Please stop the madness.
    Blessings and Peace,
    Star