Las Vegas Sun

March 31, 2015

Currently: 83° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account


CCSD’s fiscal outlook brightens as budget discussions begin


Richard Brian

Jeff Weiler, chief financial officer for the Clark County School District, speaks during a 2008 budget meeting at Western High School.

Sun coverage

What a difference two years can make.

In 2011, the Clark County School District was faced with more than $400 million in budget cuts as the recession continued to ravage the Las Vegas economy.

The worst of those cuts were averted in the final days of the Legislature when Gov. Brian Sandoval and lawmakers extended some business and sales taxes that were set to expire.

As state lawmakers debate the next biennial K-12 education budget this Legislative session, the School District is breathing a little easier.

After cutting hundreds of millions of dollars in the wake of the Great Recession, the district is seeing revenues rebound.

The local school support tax revenue — which represents 40 percent of the district's $2 billion budget — is anticipated to cross the $800 million mark. That would be a record high for the district, about $100 million more than it received in prerecession 2007.

In addition, for the first time since 2009, the School District is anticipating a slight increase in property tax revenue, which represents about a fifth of the district's general fund budget.

The nation's fifth-largest school district also estimates another record-breaking student enrollment next school year. The district anticipates an additional 1,500 students, which would bring the total number of students to an estimated 312,782. Additional state support to the district would accompany those students.

Furthermore, the Legislature is expected to send more state funding to local school districts for a bevy of education initiatives, including full-day kindergarten and English-language learner support. If lawmakers change the K-12 funding formula, Clark County may stand to receive more state money, as well.

How much, and whether it will be enough to match the district's falling expenditures, remains to be seen. However, the additional revenue will go a long way toward helping the district recover from the recession, according to Jeff Weiler, the district's chief financial officer.

Since the recession, the School District has seen more than $500 million in reductions, according to district officials. Last year, the district was forced to not replace more than 1,000 teachers who left the district through attrition.

The district's first priority will be to reduce class sizes by hiring teachers and other school staff, Weiler said. The district hopes to hire 2,000 new teachers using money from an arbitration decision that allowed the district to freeze teacher salaries.

Over the next four or five years, the district also will begin to restore its reserves, Weiler said.

Currently, the district has an ending fund balance of 1 percent of its total budget. School Board policy mandates a minimum reserve level of 2 percent, which would be used to pay for emergencies.

"We really are in a situation where we are not in a fiscally prudent situation with the 1 percent," School Board member Erin Cranor said.

The School District will release its tentative budget figures on April 3. The School Board must adopt a tentative budget before a state-imposed April 15 deadline.

A final budget must be submitted to the state Department of Taxation by June 8. The 2014 fiscal year begins July 1.

The board is expected to have a lively discussion about the district's budget priorities at its next work session meeting at 8 a.m. April 3, at the Edward Greer Education Center.

"The budget is the most 'show me' and least 'tell me' part of what our priorities are," Cranor said. "It literally is putting money where our mouth is.”

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 3 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Dear Nevada Lawmakers:
    We almost have a case of "taxation without representation," when school district "reserves" are sourced primarily on the backs of taking from the paychecks of teachers, and from the types of compelled "attrition" of some thousand teachers. Just from my own observations, salary freezes SHOULD only be a temporary, emergency measure, not a permanent measure. It is unfair to continue to "tax" the worker so that they have a job, and then also create/build "reserves" to boot.

    It has gotten to the point where teachers can no longer afford to buy for their classrooms, because that money now goes to increased costs of living for their home utilities, insurance, medical costs, groceries, and fuel. This brings morale and productivity down, as well as a feeling of guilt, because it now comes down to either paying one's increased bills or seeing to the needs of a/some students who otherwise would not get the help. It is a very sad state of affairs.

    There was a time when teachers gladly were involved with school activities afterhours. Now days, many such teachers are working second jobs.

    It is way past time for Nevada Lawmakers to have the will and heart to change tax revenue laws in the Nevada Constitution for sustainably and adequately funding Nevada's infracture as our schools. As industries are seeing "record" profits, even compared to pre-2008, it should be happening. Hopefully, this 77th Nevada State Legislative Session is not another "kicking the political can down the road" wasted 120 days for those in education. It is an abuse of power and public trust to continue the same well-worn historic road Nevada has been on for a century worth of decades. Please FUND education Lawmakers!

    Blessings and Peace,

  2. Money for education would certainly help the struggling CCSD. Hopefully, they won't cut this increase in a few years and drive out the new teachers that they're hiring.

  3. To those who fall for the line about Nevada not funding K-12, read the article. Add 40% of entire budget on top of dsa to see what Nevada SUT actually pays into K-12. Why does K-12 in Nevada cost more than in Arizona? Arizona gets graduates who can read and write although they spend $1,000 per student per year LESS and Arizona has MORE ELL'S.