Las Vegas Sun

October 26, 2014

Currently: 75° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Senate measure would begin to clear way for legalizing gay marriage in Nevada

Legislators took the first step toward legalizing same-sex marriage in Nevada today.

Sen. Tick Segerblom, D-Las Vegas, introduced a Senate Joint Resolution that would repeal the section of Nevada’s constitution that says “only a marriage between a male and female person shall be recognized.”

The repeal would start the lengthy process by which Nevada could legalize same-sex marriage. The resolution needs to pass by majority vote in the Legislature this year and again in 2015 before it would be placed on the 2016 ballot. If the majority of voters in Nevada decide to repeal the marriage definition, then the Legislature could act in 2017 to legalize same-sex marriage in statute.

Vanessa Spinaloza, lobbyist for the ACLU, worked with Segerblom on the resolution and said she’s confident that a majority of legislators support the repeal.

A measure that would simultaneously repeal the ban on same-sex marriages and replace it with language allowing same-sex marriages draws less support, she said.

“There’s a little fear that if we did that, we wouldn’t get the whole thing,” she said.

“Repeal is all we need right now,” Segerblom said. “It gives it to a vote of the people.”

The issue is also before the U.S. Supreme Court, which will decide the legality of California’s Proposition 8 banning same-sex marriage.

Numerous Democrats in both the Senate and the Assembly have sponsored or co-sponsored the resolutions. No Republicans have yet signed on.

Stacy Shinn of the Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada, another group that has worked on the resolution, said the organization would support an effort to amend Segerblom’s measure to both repeal the prohibition on same-sex marriage and replace it with language legalizing same-sex marriage if PLAN believes the majority of legislators would vote for full legalization.

“The time is right for marriage equality, and it would benefit us if we moved quickly,” she said. “It’s coming, and we might as well get on the train.”

Beyond the equal rights arguments for legalizing same-sex marriage, Shinn said Nevada could reap the benefits of same-sex marriage tourism.

The Las Vegas Convention and Visitor’s Bureau is already marketing specifically to gay and lesbian couples. Adding weddings to the mix could be an economic boon for Nevada.

“We’re already a huge destination for weddings anyway,” Shinn said. “If we could expand to the LGBT community, we would benefit.”

Nevada voters approved the same-sex marriage ban in 2000 and 2002.

Richard Ziser of Nevada Concerned Citizens helped pass the ban and said Monday that same-sex couples already have domestic partnership rights in Nevada.

“They want the recognition and acceptance of getting married,” he said. “That’s where the battle lines get drawn. If they (legislators) want to do the heavy lifting for the homosexual community, they’ll have to face voters two years from now.”

While the ballot measures 10 years ago won by wide margins, a poll from the Retail Association of Nevada last month shows support for same-sex marriage and repeal of the “Protection of Marriage” clause in the state constitution.

The poll asks respondents “would you favor or oppose removing the Protection of Marriage provision from the Nevada Constitution? Removing this provision would allow same-sex couples to legally marry in Nevada.”

The poll states that 54 percent of Nevadans favor repeal while 43 percent oppose. Nearly all Nevada demographics support the repeal language with only the population older than 65 opposed, according to the poll.

This story was updated to clarify PLAN’s position on an amendment to the measure.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 1 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. A different perspective. I'm gay and Robert and I have been together 19 years and were legally wed in Canada 9 years ago. We say NO! NO! NO! To my friends who have changed their minds on this issue we can't thank you enough. We are heartened to see how many Nevadans have thought this through in a critical wayand have seen that our marriage has not affected yours and that all citizens gay and straight should be treated equally under the law.
    Maybe the great "defenders of marriage" like Senator Ensign and Governor Gibbons helped you to change your mind to believe that civil marriage should be considered a right for gay couples after all. Which brings me to the point. NOBODY'S CIVIL RIGHTS SHOULD BE PUT UP FOR A VOTE! THAT'S WHY THEY ARE CALLED RIGHTS! These votes never should have happened to begin with. We trust the courts. We believe in the justice system. And we believe that marriage equality will one day be law. But a resounding NO for asking people to judge me again with the hateful lawn signs and misleading commercials appropriate for a five year old let alone a critically thinking adult. It's demeaning, it's hurtful, and frankly Robert and I have seen and had enough ignorance and stupidity thrown at us over this issue to last us the rest of our natural lives. Nevada did a dumb thing. Twice. No more, thank you.