Las Vegas Sun

July 29, 2014

Currently: 95° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Steven Brooks asks Nevada Supreme Court to give him a seat at Legislature

Assemblyman Steven Brooks of the 77th (2013) Nevada Assembly District.

Assemblyman Steven Brooks of the 77th (2013) Nevada Assembly District.

Assemblyman Steven Brooks, D-North Las Vegas, who has been banned from the legislative building following multiple arrests, has petitioned the Nevada Supreme Court to reclaim his seat at the Legislature.

In a writ officially filed today, Brooks said the Assembly does not have the power to bar him from the seat he was elected to last November.

Assembly Majority Leader William Horne in February said Brooks was placed on administrative leave and barred from entering the legislative building. A select committee of the Assembly has been formed to investigate and determine whether Brooks should be permanently barred from serving in this session. The constitution gives the Legislature authority to seat or expel its members.

Clark County District Attorney Steve Wolfson announced Monday that felony charges of resisting an officer with a weapon would be filed against the troubled assemblyman. And misdemeanor charges would be brought including one of domestic violence.

The charges stem from an argument at the home of his wife and police response.

Mitchell Posin, the attorney for Brooks, filed an emergency motion for a writ of mandamus asking the Supreme Court to either immediately seat the Assemblyman or schedule a hearing on the actions of the Assembly. The writ is filed against the full Legislature.

Posin said, “Here, the Legislature has imposed an extra-constitutional qualification on Assemblyman Brooks’ right and duty to serve his constituents, which they cannot do.”

He cites a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1969 in which the House of Representatives sought to block one of its members from serving.

Posin said Brooks has been duly elected and should be permitted to serve.

Horne said in his Feb. 11 letter that the behavior of Brooks ”may present a direct threat to others in the building" that has prompted increased security.

The majority leader said, “As you know, the Assembly has the constitutional duty to judge the qualifications of its own members, determine the rules of its proceedings and punish members for disorderly conduct.”

He said a vote by two-thirds of the Assembly could expel a member.

Brooks will have an opportunity to present his side of the story to the select committee that will make recommendations to the full Assembly.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 3 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. As I have said in many comments, it may not be right but there is no law that allows the assembly to proceed the way they are. My only question is why Brooks' lawyer waited so long to file this.

  2. As the Nevada Constitution allocates power to the Leg to determine its own membership I'm not sure that the Court has any jurisdiction save to ensure that the Leg follows its own rules.

  3. What an embarrasement to the State of Nevada to have an elected official who just doesn't know when to say when. He is a let down to the people who voted for him , this is why you don't vote in homeys in hoodies to go to Carson City.