Las Vegas Sun

August 30, 2014

Currently: 87° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

OTHER VOICES:

Governor’s vetoes about politics, not better voting

Gov. Brian Sandoval’s recent veto of two bills meant to help Nevadans vote shows he is more interested in party politics than improving the voting experience in the Silver State. Each election, voters must navigate bureaucratic obstacles and registration deadlines well before Election Day. The legislation, Assembly Bills 440 and 441, would have removed some of these roadblocks and helped Nevadans by expanding voting options. Apparently, Sandoval did not recognize the need for these reforms and halted any progress the Legislature tried to make.

AB440 would have moved the registration deadline closer to Election Day, when more voters are likely to be paying attention and aware of what issues and candidates are on the ballot. Moving the registration deadline closer to Election Day gives people time to register or update their address at a time when they are most interested in the election. The bill would still have given election officials enough time to prepare for upcoming elections. With the governor’s veto, voters will still have to mail in a registration or register online nearly a month before Election Day, or register in person at the registrar’s office three weeks before Election Day.

This bill would have offered Nevadans two weeks when they would be able to register and cast their ballot at the same time. Evidence has shown that allowing people to register and vote on the same day helps turnout in the 10 states and the District of Columbia, where it is used. In those states, turnout was approximately 8 percentage points higher than states without that option in the 2012 general election.

Sandoval listed the many ways Nevadans are able to register to vote and used that as part of his explanation not to extend the deadline. And he is right — there are many options, but that does not mean there should not be more. Options such as those vetoed by Sandoval would have helped the 7,000 people who attempted to register to vote but missed the deadline in November 2012. Such options may also have helped raise Nevada’s voter turnout above the national average.

Also vetoed by Sandoval were the nonprecinct-based vote centers provided for in AB441. The bill would have allowed a voter to cast a ballot on Election Day at a vote center rather than his or her assigned polling place. This bill would have offered a new level of flexibility by taking advantage of new technology and expanding a system that is already in place. The early voting centers have proved to be very popular with nearly 620,000 Nevadans voting early for the 2012 general election. Nearly twice as many ballots were cast early, not including mail-in absentee voters, than there were cast on Election Day. Unfortunately, Sandoval viewed expanding the already tested, established and popular system as unnecessary. In fact, offering this option would likely have reduced the number of provisional ballots used in Nevada and increased the number of ballots that were able to be counted on Election Day.

The Legislature recognized that when it comes to promoting our most cherished freedom — voting — we should strive to encourage all Nevadans to participate. The governor seems to be satisfied with the status quo.

Ben Hovland is senior counsel of the Fair Elections Legal Network, an advocacy group in Washington.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 4 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Most folks here who BOTHER to vote at all, are already registered, so what's the issue? I registered years ago and have never had to anything more than go vote. There are plenty of early voting sites now, and I've never waited more than 5 minutes to cast my vote. I see no reason for the two bills that were vetoed. The system ain't broken so why the attempt to "fix" it? For those wishing to register, there are several ways to get it done, including for example, the DMV.

  2. There's a reason that Governors have the power of veto. So that they can exercise it when they deem necessary and appropriate. There's a reason for advocacy groups in Washington, DC. Having worked in Washington for 33 years, I'm still not sure what it is.

    Carmine D

  3. The concept here is to make it easier for criminal invaders, felons and multiple times voters to cheat the system. You have years to get registered so I will not lose any sleep over laziness in Nevada.

  4. Ref the vetoes of AB440 and AB441: Republican'ts have discovered the corollary to the idea of "One person, one vote." That's "One LESS person, one LESS vote." Without physically doing away with opposition voters, these vetoes are among the closest a Republican't can come to ensuring "One LESS voter..."

    Loosing to the opposition after a period of debate about a position is politics. Manipulating the system to deny the opposition an opportunity to vote at all is unadulterated tyranny.

    Ref the 5:05 a.m. post of Ressince73 (Gary Lind): Gary: I've moved regularly. The day I'm eligible to register at a new residence, I'm in line. But I may not bother to vote at all - particularly for local issues that I know nothing about and can't possibly get up to speed on before an election.